This 30-minute interview has just been published and broadcast in New York City, and is also available for viewing online: Alfred C. Meyer, Board Member of Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR) & Kevin Kamps, Radioactive Waste Watchdog at Beyond Nuclear, discuss the danger of continuing radioactive leaks at Indian Point, Buchanan, New York. An Access for All Production produced through the facilities of Manhattan Neighborhood Network, by Gloria Messer, Producer/Director.
Nuclear power cannot address climate change effectively or in time. Reactors have long, unpredictable construction times are expensive - at least $12 billion or higher per reactor. Furthermore, reactors are sitting-duck targets vulnerable to attack and routinely release - as well as leak - radioactivity. There is so solution to the problem of radioactive waste.
As reported by Kathiann M. Kowalski at Midwest Energy News, concerns regarding risks to Ohioans' pocketbooks, as well as safety, health, and environment, are mounting in the aftermath of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio's (PUCO) March 31 ruling in favor of a multi-billion dollar ratepayer bailout for FirstEnergy, including its problem-plagued Davis-Besse atomic reactor.
The article quotes Tim Judson, executive director at NIRS:
The Davis-Besse nuclear power station and similar plants would particularly have trouble remaining competitive, in Judson’s view.
“Davis-Besse has a terrible operational history,” Judson said. “It’s had significant safety problems."
The plant also has “some very significant expenses that are going to need to potentially be incurred in the next few years due to some significant equipment problems,” he added.
Beyond Nuclear and Don't Waste Michigan issued a press release in response to the PUCO's bad decision, listing the numerous, large ticket capital expenses Davis-Besse faces in the near future, by its own documented admissions. (See the Word version for functioning URL links.)
The press release quotes the environmental coalition's legal counsel, Toledo attorney Terry Lodge: The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) chained and shackled Ohio ratepayers with a burdensome "Pig in a Poke" known as Davis-Besse.
One of the biggest concerns of all is the severe, and worsening, cracking of Davis-Besse's concrete containment Shield Building. Another big concern is the risky, experimental steam generator replacement project, just undergoing inspections now, two years after installation.
Beyond Nuclear and environmental allies officially intervened on both matters, and many others, it their resistance to the 20-year license extension at Davis-Besse. NRC has rubber-stamped that nonetheless.
The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis has also published a scathing critique of the PUCO's bailout approval. IEEFA is based in Cleveland, OH.
As reported on April 7th by Nucleonics Week, a Beyond Nuclear and Don't Waste Michigan press release detailed the numerous, large ticket expenses Davis-Besse faces in the immediate future. The most significant of these include the severely cracked, and ever worsening, concrete containment Shield Building, as well as the risky, experimental steam generator replacements.
When "FirstEnergy says PUC vote assures Davis-Besse operation for several years," Beyond Nuclear begs to differ
In an article entitled "FirstEnergy says PUC vote assures Davis-Besse operation for several years," Nucleonics Week reporter Michael McAuliffe quoted Beyond Nuclear's Kevin Kamps:
A coalition of anti-nuclear and environmental groups including Beyond Nuclear was also critical of the PUC decision.
“PUCO’s $4 billion bailout to FirstEnergy will mostly go towards padding the pockets of company executives and shareholders, not to critically needed repairs of safety systems, structures, and components,” Beyond Nuclear spokesman Kevin Kamps said in a March 31 statement.
[FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company, FENOC, spokesman] Colafella said “there are currently no major capital improvements needed at Davis-Besse.” But the coalition said that among needed plant maintenance is repairing a shield building which has a multitude of cracks. The shield building protects the reactor from impact by external objects.
Kamps questioned whether Davis-Besse will be able to remain in operation for the eight years covered by the plan and said in an April 4 interview that FirstEnergy does not “plan on plowing much of their bailout back into maintenance, and the NRC didn’t require it.” More.
RT has interviewed investigative journalist Karl Grossman (photo left) on the risks of age-degraded nuclear power plants like Indian Point near New York City, where rusted and even missing bolts are but the latest safety scare.
Entergy Nuclear's Indian Point Units 2 and 3 reactors, some 25 miles up the Hudson River from the New York City limits, are both operating on expired operating licenses, compliments of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's lax rules. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is leading the charge for Indian Point's shutdown.
So too is New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, whose office has sued NRC over its false Nuclear Waste Confidence policy. (Beyond Nuclear is an official party in the NY v. NRC II proceeding currently before the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.)
Karl describes the potentially "catastrophic" risks of running reactors not 40 years, but 60 and even 80 years, including with power "uprates" -- operating aged reactors harder and hotter, to make more electricity, to make more money.
Karl points out that the answer is to shut these old nuclear power plants immediately, to eliminate the Chernobyl- and Fukushima-like reactor risks, and to stop the generation of radioactive waste. The electricity can be replaced with renewables like wind and solar, which are here today.
Karl serves as a Beyond Nuclear board member.