<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.159 (http://www.squarespace.com) on Sat, 25 May 2013 23:18:06 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>Nuclear Regulatory Commission</title><subtitle>Nuclear Regulatory Commission</subtitle><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/atom.xml"/><updated>2013-05-09T21:51:15Z</updated><generator uri="http://five.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.159 (http://www.squarespace.com)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>"Worst Week Since Fukushima: 4 Setbacks in 3 Days are Latest Stumbles for Nuclear Power Industry"</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/2013/5/9/worst-week-since-fukushima-4-setbacks-in-3-days-are-latest-s.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/2013/5/9/worst-week-since-fukushima-4-setbacks-in-3-days-are-latest-s.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-05-09T21:49:55Z</published><updated>2013-05-09T21:49:55Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><strong>Former NRC Commissioner Peter Bradford</strong>, and energy economist Mark Cooper, both of the Vermont Law School, as well as Dan Hirsch of the Committee to Bridge the Gap, held a telephone press conference yesterday on the subject of&nbsp;<a href="http://216.30.191.148/worstweek.html" target="_blank">"WORST WEEK SINCE FUKUSHIMA: 4 MAJOR SETBACKS IN 3 DAYS ARE LATEST STUMBLES FOR U.S. NUCLEAR POWER INDUSTRY."</a>&nbsp;An&nbsp;<a href="http://www.hastingsgroupmedia.com/050813/NuclearWorstWeektelenewsevent.mp3" target="_blank">audio recording of the news conference has been posted online.</a></p>
<p>The four setbacks in three days include: 1) the cancellation of two proposed new reactors at South Texas Project, because they violate U.S. law, <strong>which NRC must obey</strong>, against foreign ownership of nuclear power plants; 2) Southern California Edison's threat that <strong>if NRC does not allow it to restart operations </strong>at its crippled San Onofre nuclear power plant, it will permanently shutdown both reactors there; 3) Duke Energy's cancellation of two proposed new atomic reactors at its Shearon Harris nuclear power plant in North Carolina; and 4) Florida's amendment to its previously highly permissive "advance cost recovery" or "Construction Work in Progress" law, via which ratepayers have been gouged to pay for proposed new reactors, when there is no guarantee the proposed new reactors will ever actually get built or generate electricity.</p>
<p>Peter Bradford also added the May 7th shutdown of Dominion's Kewaunee atomic reactor in WI -- despite the 20 years of operating license still left to it, <strong>thanks to a license extension rubberstamp provided by NRC </strong>-- as another example of the "worst week since Fukushima" for the U.S. nuclear power industry.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>NRC "looking at the potential implications" of radioactive goldfish found deep in the heart of FirstEnergy's Perry atomic reactor in Ohio</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/2013/5/8/nrc-looking-at-the-potential-implications-of-radioactive-gol.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/2013/5/8/nrc-looking-at-the-potential-implications-of-radioactive-gol.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-05-08T04:01:30Z</published><updated>2013-05-08T04:01:30Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/blinky.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1367985739148" alt="" /></span></span><a href="http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2013/05/03/Workers_find_goldfish_in_nuclear_plant_tunnel.html" target="_blank">As reported by the Associated Press</a>, two radioactive goldfish, swimming in radioactive reactor coolant water in a lemonade pitcher, were discovered by workers in a steam tunnel deep in the heart of FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company's (FENOC) problem-plagued Perry atomic reactor on the shore of Lake Erie northeast of Cleveland.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2013/05/firstenergy_finds_goldfish_in.html" target="_blank">As reported by the&nbsp;<em>Cleveland Plain Dealer</em>:</a></p>
<p>'...The fishy tale has prompted federal regulators to ask a lot of new questions about morale at Perry and whether plant operators can control access to radioactive areas as required by regulation...</p>
<p>Because of<a href="http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2011/07/nrc_inspectors_critical_of_per.html">&nbsp;a life-threatening incident during refueling two years ago at Perry</a>&nbsp;in which three contractors were briefly exposed to hard radiation, the NRC has put the plant under a microscope on the issue of worker safety. The agency was already preparing to send squads of inspectors to the plant in June in an effort to determine whether Perry has corrected past shortcomings. Extra inspectors were at the plant earlier during this shutdown.</p>
<p>The company and the NRC said this latest incident is no laughing matter, as in the cartoon TV series "The Simpsons" in which Blinky, an orange fish, supposedly had three eyes from radiation exposure. Whoever was involved in the Perry incident will not get off as easily as nuclear worker Homer Simpson usually does...</p>
<p>"This is not something that happens every day. We want to know why it happened and how it happened," said Viktoria Mitlyng, NRC spokeswoman for the agency's Midwest region. "We are looking at the potential implications." '</p>
<p>Add that one to the&nbsp;<a href="http://allthingsnuclear.org/fission-stories-133-mayflies-and-squirrels-and-rats/" target="_blank">"Fission Stories"!</a></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>High noon for nuclear power: Dominion's Kewaunee atomic reactor permanently shuts down!</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/2013/5/7/high-noon-for-nuclear-power-dominions-kewaunee-atomic-reacto.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/2013/5/7/high-noon-for-nuclear-power-dominions-kewaunee-atomic-reacto.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-05-08T03:19:21Z</published><updated>2013-05-08T03:19:21Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/kewaunee-indv.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1367984066990" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 260px;">Dominion's Kewaunee atomic reactor on the Lake Michigan shore of northern WI near Green Bay</span></span><a href="http://www.platts.com/RSSFeedDetailedNews/RSSFeed/ElectricPower/21015144" target="_blank">As reported by&nbsp;<em>Platt's</em></a>, at 12 PM Noon Central time today, Dominion's Kewaunee atomic reactor was permanently shutdown. Last October, Dominion announced its intention to permanently close Kewaunee by mid-2013. Dominion had attempted to sell Kewaunee, but found no buyers. Platt's reports "CMS Energy -- which sold Palisades, its only nuclear station, to Entergy in 2007 -- had considered buying the plant, but decided against it because of low gas prices and investor pushback."</p>
<p>Arnie Gundersen of Fairewinds Associates, Inc points out that&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nrc.gov/info-finder/reactor/kewa.html" target="_blank">Kewaunee</a>&nbsp;still had an operating license for another 20 years <strong>(thanks to a license extension rubberstamped by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission)</strong>, but Dominion is unable to operate the reactor economically. Gundersen also points out that the 60-year SAFESTOR plan prior to decommissioning means Kewaunee will not be dismantled and cleaned up until about a century after it commenced operations, in 1973.</p>
<p>Duke Energy's announcement in recent weeks regarding the fatally cracked containment at its Crystal River, FL reactor, and today's final SCRAM at Kewaunee, are the first permanent shutdowns of commercial atomic reactors in the U.S. in about 15 years. Kewaunee joins Zion 1 &amp; 2 in IL, and Big Rock Point in MI, on the list of reactors on the Lake Michigan shore permanently shutdown. Point Beach 1 &amp; 2 in WI, as well as Cook 1 &amp; 2 and Palisades in MI, are reactors still operating on the Lake Michigan shoreline. Lake Michigan is a headwaters of the Great Lakes, 20% of the world's surface fresh water, and drinking water supply for 8 U.S. states, 2 Canadian provinces, and a large number of Native American First Nations.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Entergy's Palisades leaks 79 gallons of radioactive water into Lake Michigan, forced to shut down</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/2013/5/7/entergys-palisades-leaks-79-gallons-of-radioactive-water-int.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/2013/5/7/entergys-palisades-leaks-79-gallons-of-radioactive-water-int.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-05-08T02:21:44Z</published><updated>2013-05-08T02:21:44Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 300px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/palisades_small.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1367980858939" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 300px;">Entergy's Palisades atomic reactor on the Lake Michigan shore in southwest MI</span></span><a href="http://www.hollandsentinel.com/topstories/x2062763324/NRC-Very-slightly-radioactive-water-enters-Lake-Michigan" target="_blank">As reported by the&nbsp;<em>Holland Sentinel</em>,</a>&nbsp;Entergy's Palisades atomic reactor has yet again sprung a leak, this time spilling 79 gallons of supposedly "very slightly radioactive water" into Lake Michigan, the headwaters of 20% of the world's surface fresh water, and drinking water for 40 million people downstream.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Entergy and NRC spokespersons' repeated claims of no safety significance to the public flies in the face of decades of findings, as by&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nirs.org/press/06-30-2005/1" target="_blank">the National Academy of Science (most recently in 2005</a>), that any exposure to radioactivity, no matter how small, carries a health risk of cancer, and that these health risks accumulate over a lifetime.</p>
<p>U.S. Representative Ed Markey (D-MA) made public the serious nature of this particular leaking tank in June 2012. His information came from very courageous Palisades whistleblowers, and their attorney, Billie Pirner Garde. The leak, from the 300,000 gallon Safety Injection Refueling Water (SIRW) storage tank located directly above the control, began in mid-2011, and was flowing through the ceiling, and being captured in buckets in the safety critical control room, full of electrical circuitry and equipment that cannot get wet. The leak was concealed not only from the public and media, but even from the NRC's own Chairman, Greg Jaczko, as he toured Palisades on May 25, 2012. NRC later granted Entergy an exemption in 2012 to allow continued operations despite the degraded condition of the SIRW storage tank.&nbsp;</p>
<p>In recent weeks, Beyond Nuclear learned from NRC officials that the now two-year-old leak has continued at a 0.5 to 1 gallon per day rate. But Saturday's leakage rate, which forced the reactor to shut down, was at 90 gallons per day, as documented in&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/event/en.html#en49002" target="_blank">NRC's event notification report.</a>&nbsp;Palisades' SIRW storage tank, just like the rest of the plant, is 46 years old, and obviously showing severe signs of "breakdown phase" age-degration, of increasing risk.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The&nbsp;<em><a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20130505/NEWS06/305050136/palisades-nuclear-power-plant-michigan" target="_blank">Detroit Free Press</a></em>,&nbsp;<em><a href="http://enformable.com/2013/05/37033/" target="_blank">Enformable Nuclear News</a></em>,&nbsp;<em><a href="http://www.mlive.com/news/kalamazoo/index.ssf/2013/05/water_leak_at_palisades_nuclea.html#incart_river_default" target="_blank">Kalamazoo Gazette</a></em>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.michiganradio.org/post/palisades-shutdown-comes-after-assumed-unplanned-release-radioactive-water-lake-michigan" target="_blank">Michigan Radio</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.wsjm.com/NRC-79-Gallons-Of-Mildly-Radioactive-Water-From-Pa/16279945" target="_blank">WSJM Radio</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://wkzo.com/news/articles/2013/may/06/palisades-nuclear-switched-off-over-the-weekend-to-fix-a-leak/" target="_blank">WKZO Radio</a>,<a href="http://www.wwmt.com/shared/news/features/top-stories/stories/wwmt_nrc-very-slightly-radioactive-water-enters-lake-9825.shtml" target="_blank">WWMT TV-3 Kalamazoo</a>,&nbsp;<em><a href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130505/METRO/305050333" target="_blank">Detroit News</a></em>, &nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="http://www.woodtv.com/dpp/news/local/sw_mich/nrc-radioactive-water-enters-lake" target="_blank">WOOD TV-8 Grand Rapids</a>&nbsp;have reported on this story.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/5%206%202013%20Kevin%20Kamps%20media%20statement%20on%2079%20gallons%20of%20radioactive%20water%20spilled%20into%20Lake%20Michigan.pdf" target="_blank">Beyond Nuclear issued a media statement</a>, challenging flippant Entergy and&nbsp;<a href="http://www.sfgate.com/business/energy/article/NRC-Very-slightly-radioactive-water-enters-lake-4492701.php" target="_blank">NRC claims that this leak carries "absolutely" no risk to human health and safety.</a>&nbsp;NRC's Region 3 spokeswoman has been exposed making false claims regarding radioactivity leaks more than once at Midwestern reactors in just the past year, prompting the demand for an investigation by a member of Congress.&nbsp;Last year, U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) demanded an NRC investigation into Mytling's downplaying of a reactor leak at the troubled Davis-Besse atomic reactor near Toledo. In addition, Chicago watchdog group Nuclear Energy Information Service, via a Freedom of Information Act Request to the State of Illinois Dept. of Nuclear Safety, documented that Mytling's flip assurance -- that a radioactive steam leak at the Byron atomic reactor, in Jan. 2012, must have contained exceedingly low levels of hazardous radioactive tritium, as radiation monitors had not detected any -- was baseless and misleading, as no real-time tritium monitoring capability existed at the plant. Similar questions must now be asked of Mytling's questionable assurances that radioactivity levels in the water leaked into Lake Michigan were below detectable levels. Are there radiation monitors in place to verify such flip assurances?</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Entergy Watch: Environmental coalition challenges Entergy's financial qualifications to continue operating reactors</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/2013/5/7/entergy-watch-environmental-coalition-challenges-entergys-fi.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/2013/5/7/entergy-watch-environmental-coalition-challenges-entergys-fi.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-05-07T19:16:21Z</published><updated>2013-05-07T19:16:21Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 250px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/BurningMoneyFLAT.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1367955145332" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 250px;">"Burning money" graphic by Gene Case, Avenging Angels</span></span><a href="http://www.eenews.net/Greenwire/2013/05/07/14" target="_blank">As reported by E&amp;E's Hannah Northey at&nbsp;<em>Greenwire</em></a>, an environmental coalition including such groups as Alliance for a Green Economy (AGREE), Beyond Nuclear, Citizens Awareness Network (CAN), and Pilgrim Watch, has launched an emergency enforcement petition at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, challenging the financial qualifications of Entergy Nuclear to safely operate and decommission such reactors at FitzPatrick in New York, Pilgrim in Massachusetts, and Vermont Yankee. All three reactors happen to be twin designs to Fukushima Daiichi Units 1 to 4, that is, General Electric Mark I boiling water reactors. The coalition's petition cited financial analyses by UBS on Entergy's dire economic straits. Representatives from coalition groups, including Beyond Nuclear's Paul Gunter, testified today before an NRC Petition Review Board at the agency's headquarters in Rockville, MD.&nbsp;</p>
<p>FitzPatrick, Pilgrim, and Vermont Yankee have each already recieved 20-year license extension rubber-stamps from NRC. FitzPatrick, even though it never installed a hardened vent in the early 1990s, to deal with its too small, too weak containment -- the only one, of 23 Mark I in the U.S., to not do so. Pilgrim became the longest contested license extension -- a proceeding lasting over 6 years -- thanks to the efforts of Mary Lampert at Pilgrim Watch. And the Vermont Yankee license extension was actually blocked by the State of Vermont -- this court battle between and involving the state, Entergy, and NRC rages on in multiple federal and state venues.</p>
<p>In a Feb. 8, 2013 interview with Reuters, Entergy's brand new CEO, Leo Denault, admitted that one of the main financial challenges Entergy faces is the high cost of making vital safety repairs on its age-degraded reactors.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>More than 2,500 to call on NRC to revoke reactor licenses: Join May 2 call!</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/2013/5/1/more-than-2500-to-call-on-nrc-to-revoke-reactor-licenses-joi.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/2013/5/1/more-than-2500-to-call-on-nrc-to-revoke-reactor-licenses-joi.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-05-01T14:38:40Z</published><updated>2013-05-01T14:38:40Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="ssNonEditable full-image-float-left"><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/post-images/fukumeltdown200.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1367419071508" alt="" /></span>Representatives from&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/mark-1-campaign/fof/gdc-10-16/fof_org_list_link_03212013_rv1.pdf">24 organizations</a>&nbsp;from across the United States have&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/freeze-our-fukushimas/2013/3/21/petition-nrc-to-revoke-the-operating-licenses-of-dangerous-g.html">petitioned</a>&nbsp;the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to revoke the operating license of the General Electric&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/mark-1-campaign/fof/GE%20MARK%20I%20BOILING%20WATER%20REACTORS%20IN%20THE%20UNITED%20STATES.pdf">Mark I</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/mark-1-campaign/fof/GE%20MARK%20II%20BOILING%20WATER%20REACTORS%20%20IN%20THE%20UNITED%20STATES.pdf">Mark II</a>&nbsp;boiling water reactors like those at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear site in Japan. More than 2,500 co-petitioners are calling for the emergency closure. The NRC public meeting will be broadcast live in a&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/freeze-our-fukushimas/2013/4/25/nrc-to-webcast-may-2nd-public-call-to-close-us-fukushima-sty.html">webcast and toll-free telephone conference call</a>&nbsp;by the agency on&nbsp;<strong>Thursday, May 2, 2013 from 1 to 3PM Eastern.&nbsp;</strong></p>
<p>&ldquo;Anybody paying attention during the Fukushima disaster knows that if a nuclear accident happens here these same reactor designs very likely will not protect us from radiation releases,&rdquo; said Paul Gunter, Director of the Reactor Oversight Project for Takoma Park, MD-based Beyond Nuclear.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/documents/bn_news_05022013_revoke_mk_final.pdf" target="_blank">Read the full press release</a>.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>1 killed, 4-8 injured, offsite electricity lost due to drop of 500 ton load at Entergy's Arkansas Nuclear One plant</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/2013/4/1/1-killed-4-8-injured-offsite-electricity-lost-due-to-drop-of.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/2013/4/1/1-killed-4-8-injured-offsite-electricity-lost-due-to-drop-of.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-04-02T03:47:34Z</published><updated>2013-04-02T03:47:34Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/ANO.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1364874519365" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 250px;">NRC file photo of Entergy's Arkansas Nuclear One twin reactor station</span></span><a href="http://www.nasdaq.com/article/update-federal-inspectors-investigate-fatal-accident-at-arkansas-nuclear-plant-20130401-00807#.UVpLt6Wrihg" target="_blank">As reported by&nbsp;<em>Dow Jones Business News</em></a>, a 24-year-old worker named Wade Walters of Russellville, Arkansas was killed when a crane dropped a 500-ton piece of equipment called a generator stator at&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nrc.gov/info-finder/reactor/ano1.html" target="_blank">Entergy's twin reactor Arkansas Nuclear One station (see photo, left), located six miles west-northwest of Russellville in London, Arkansas.</a>&nbsp;Eight other workers were injured, one of whom remains hospitalized.</p>
<p>In 2001, NRC rubber-stamped a 20-year license extension on top of Unit 1's 1974 to 2014 original operating permit, blessing its operation till 2034. In 2005, NRC followed suit at Unit 2, enabling it to run not from 1978 till 2018, but till 2038.</p>
<p>As the article reports: "When the generator stator fell, it damaged other equipment and a water pipeline used for extinguishing fires. Water spilled from the pipeline into the building that contains the power turbine, the NRC said. The water seeped into an electrical component, causing a short-circuit that cut off power to the plant from the electric grid, according to Entergy and the NRC."<br /><br />Unit 1 was reportedly shut down for maintenance at the time of the accident, but Unit 2 was operating at full power. For a yet to be explained reason, Unit 2 "automatically" shut down after the accident. Emergency diesel generators are reportedly supplying electricity to emergency, safety, cooling, and other systems at both reactors.</p>
<p>T<a href="http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/reactor-status/ps.html#r4" target="_blank">he U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) "Current Reactor Status Report" shows</a>&nbsp;that both Arkansas Nuclear One reactors are at zero power levels.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/event/2013/20130401en.html#en48869" target="_blank">An Event Notification Report has been posted at the NRC's website.</a>&nbsp;Note that the Event Notification Report filed by Entergy reports only four injuries.&nbsp;The extent of damage to Unit 1 facilities has yet to be determined.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Coalition of concerned citizens details concerns about Palisades with NRC Commissioner Magwood</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/2013/3/27/coalition-of-concerned-citizens-details-concerns-about-palis.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/2013/3/27/coalition-of-concerned-citizens-details-concerns-about-palis.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-03-27T22:42:16Z</published><updated>2013-03-27T22:42:16Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/magwood.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1364424845684" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 159px;">NRC Commissioner William Magwood IV</span></span>A coalition comprised of 20 concerned local residents and environmental group representatives, including from Beyond Nuclear, met with U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Commissioner William Magwood IV (photo, left) for three hours on Monday evening, March 25th, in South Haven, MI, detailing their many concerns about safety, security, public health, and environmental protection -- or lack thereof -- at Entergy Nuclear's Palisades atomic reactor on the Lake Michigan shoreline in Covert, MI (see&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Agenda%20for%20NRC%20Meeting%20with%20Commissioner%20Magwood.pdf" target="_blank">the coalition's meeting agenda</a>). NRC Commissioner Magwood toured the problem-plagued plant the next morning.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Palisades%20Press%20Release%203-25-13%20Final.pdf" target="_blank">The coalition issued a press release.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.heraldpalladium.com/news/local/nrc-member-answers-palisades-critics/article_61f1c7cb-6289-5b5d-abd6-3cc45f7723d0.html" target="_blank">The&nbsp;<em>St. Joe Herald-Palladium&nbsp;</em>has<em>&nbsp;</em>reported on the meeting</a>, as did&nbsp;<a href="http://fox17online.com/2013/03/26/nuclear-reg-commissioner-to-tour-palisades-plant/#ixzz2OhOUjz3y" target="_blank">Fox 17 television Grand Rapids</a>. Michigan Radio's&nbsp;<a href="http://www.michiganradio.org/post/are-safety-problems-palisades-getting-any-better-yet" target="_blank">"Environment Report"</a>&nbsp;quoted Beyond Nuclear's Kevin Kamps.</p>
<p>NRC Commissioner Magwood's career has been devoted to the promotion of nuclear power, first as an industry insider (including as a consultant to Tokyo Electric Power Company, infamous owner of the ravaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant), and then as head of the promotional Office of Nuclear Energy at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under both Democratic and Republican administrations.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/12/nrc-coup-leader-worked-fo_n_1143895.html" target="_blank">The&nbsp;<em>Huffington Post</em>&nbsp;has published expos</a><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/12/nrc-coup-leader-worked-fo_n_1143895.html" target="_blank">&eacute;s on Magwood's attempted coups</a>&nbsp;against his bosses in order to take their jobs -- successfully at DOE, unsuccessfully at NRC.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/30/bill-magwood-nrc-_n_1712181.html" target="_blank">As also reported by&nbsp;<em>HuffPost</em></a>, U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has vowed to block Magwood's aspirations for the NRC Chairmanship, due to Magwood breaking his promise to Reid to not advocate for the controversial Yucca Mountain high-level radioactive waste dump as an NRC Commissioner.</p>
<p>Due to his career promoting nuclear power, Beyond Nuclear led the environmental&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Ltr%20to%20President%20Obama%20on%20possible%20NRC%20nominee%20FINAL.pdf" target="_blank">coalition effort to block President Obama's nomination of Magwood</a>&nbsp;for the safety-regulatory NRC Commission in the first place, as well as the U.S. Senate's confirmation of Magwood for the position (the&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/pogo_magwood_nrc_boxer_and_inhofe_10_14_09.pdf" target="_blank">Project on Government Oversight launched a separate effort</a>&nbsp;to block Magwood's confirmation). At the end of 2011, U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D-CA) cited&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/magwood_confirmation_hearing_press_statement_feb_9_2010.pdf" target="_blank">Beyond Nuclear's coalition letter opposing Magwood's confirmation</a>&nbsp;as she, too, criticized his broken promises to her about Yucca during his Feb. 2010 Senate confirmation hearing as an NRC Commissioner.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Magwood_FOIA_request_Dec_3_2011.pdf" target="_blank">Beyond Nuclear has also filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request</a>&nbsp;to NRC after receiving an anonymous tip that NRC Commissioner Magwood has been holding regular, secretive meetings with leaders of the industry's Nuclear Energy Institute, in violation of open meetings laws and regulations. However, despite filing the FOIA request on Dec. 3, 2011, NRC has not yet responded.</p>
<p>NRC has issued a&nbsp;<a href="http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1306/ML13063A177.pdf" target="_blank">notice</a>&nbsp;and <a href="http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1308/ML13084A110.pdf" target="_blank">press release</a> about its upcoming April 2nd "End of Cycle" annual performance review public meeting to be held in South Haven about Palisades. See&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/public-meetings/index.cfm?action=search.detail&amp;MeetingCode=20130179" target="_blank">more info. from NRC about the Apirl 2 meeting here</a>, including&nbsp;<a href="http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1308/ML13080A385.pdf" target="_blank">its slideshow to be presented</a>&nbsp;(note NRC has loaded its slides sideways).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nuclear-power/2013/3/18/david-lochbaum-of-ucs-to-speak-about-palisades-in-west-mi-on.html" target="_blank">On April 11th, Beyond Nuclear is co-sponsoring west Michigan presentations entitled "Preventing an American Fukushima" by David Lochbaum of Union of Concerned Scientists.</a>&nbsp;He will present at 12 noon Eastern at Western Michigan University in Kalamazoo, and at 7 PM Eastern at the Beach Haven Event Center in South Haven, less than 5 miles north of Palisades. In his annual report of near-misses at U.S. atomic reactors, Lochbaum has included incidents at Palisades (two separate incidents in 2011 alone) for the past two years, making it one of the worst-run reactors in the country.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Environmental coalition defends contentions against Fermi 3 proposed new reactor, challenges adequacy of NRC FEIS</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/2013/3/27/environmental-coalition-defends-contentions-against-fermi-3.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/2013/3/27/environmental-coalition-defends-contentions-against-fermi-3.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-03-27T04:07:21Z</published><updated>2013-03-27T04:07:21Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 200px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Terry%20Lodge.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1364357893032" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 200px;">Environmental coalition attorney Terry Lodge</span></span>Terry Lodge (photo, left), Toledo-based attorney representing an environmental coalition opposing the proposed new Fermi 3 atomic reactor targeted at the Lake Erie shore in Monroe County, MI, has filed&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Fermi%20Intervenors%20Reply%20March%2025%202013%20Contentions%203%2013%2023%2026%2027%20downloadAttachment.pdf" target="_blank">a reply to challenges</a>&nbsp;from Detroit Edison (DTE) and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff.</p>
<p>The coalition's reply re-asserted "no confidence" in DTE's ability to safely stored Class B and C "low-level" radioactive wastes on-site at Fermi 3 into the indefinite future, due to the lack of sure access to a disposal facility. it also again emphasized the lack of documented need for the 1,550 Megawatts of electricity Fermi 3 would generate. And the coalition alleged that NRC has failed to fulfill its federal responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as by the illegal "segmentation" of the needed transmission line corridor from the rest of the Fermi 3 reactor construction and operation proposal.</p>
<p>This legal filing follows by a week upon the submission of public comments about NRC's Fermi 3 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS).&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Fermi%203%20FEIS%20Comments%20Jessie%20Pauline%20Collins%20Don%27t%20Waste%20Michigan.pdf" target="_blank">The comments, commissioned by Don't Waste Michigan and prepared by Jessie Pauline Collins</a>, were endorsed by a broad coalition of individuals and environmental groups, including Beyond Nuclear. The FEIS comments included satellite images of harmful&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Lake%20Erie%20algae%202012.pdf" target="_blank">algal blooms in Lake Erie in 2012</a>, and in&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Lake%20Erie%20Satellite%20Images%20algae%20monroe%202011%202012.pdf" target="_blank">2011 to 2012</a>, attributable in significant part to thermal electric power plants such as Detroit Edison's Monroe (coal burning) Power Plant, at 3,300 Megawatts-electric the second largest coal burner in the U.S. Fermi 3's thermal discharge into Lake Erie will worsen this already very serious ecological problem.</p>
<p>In the very near future, the environmental coalition intervening against the Fermi 3 combined Construction and Operating License Application (COLA) will submit additional filings on its contentions challenging the lack of adequate quality assurance (QA) on the project, as well as its defense of the threatened Eastern Fox Snake and its critical wetlands habitat. The State of Michigan has stated that Fermi 3's construction would represent the largest impact on Great Lakes coastal wetlands in the history of state wetlands preservation law.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Latest "leak per week" at Entergy's Palisades atomic reactor</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/2013/2/20/latest-leak-per-week-at-entergys-palisades-atomic-reactor.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nrc/2013/2/20/latest-leak-per-week-at-entergys-palisades-atomic-reactor.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-02-20T17:08:34Z</published><updated>2013-02-20T17:08:34Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 300px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/palisades_small.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1361380542720" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 300px;">Entergy Nuclear's problem-plagued Palisades atomic reactor, and the inland "sweet water sea" (Lake Michigan) and countryside (southwest Michigan) which it threatens.</span></span>We told 'em so. Despite widespread resistance, NRC rubberstamped Palisades' 20-year license extension in 2007.</p>
<p>As shown at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC)&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/reactor-status/ps.html" target="_blank">"Current Power Reactor Status Report"</a>, Entergy's Palisades atomic reactor in Covert, Michigan on the Lake Michigan shoreline is at zero percent power. Why? Because, yet again, it has suffered a leak and breakdown -- but the latest of many in recent years.</p>
<p>As reported at the&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/event/2013/20130219en.html#en48758" target="_blank">NRC Event Notification</a>:</p>
<p>"TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REQUIRED SHUTDOWN DUE TO COMPONENT COOLING WATER TRAIN OUT OF SERVICE&nbsp;<br /><br />'At 2030 hours [EST] on February 14, 2013, technical specification (TS) 3.7.7 condition A was entered due to the right train of the component cooling water (CCW) system being declared inoperable. The cause of the inoperable train was the identification of an approximate 40 gallon per hour CCW system to service water system leak inside the 'A' CCW heat exchanger. TS 3.7.7 condition A requires restoration of the inoperable train within 72 hours. If the restoration is not completed within 72 hours, the plant must be in Mode 3 within 6 hours and in Mode 5 within the subsequent 36 hours.'&nbsp;<br /><br />'Due to the inability to repair the leak within the required 72 hour time frame during power operation, a plant shutdown was initiated at approximately 1300 hours on February 15, 2013. Entry into Mode 3 is expected at approximately 1700 hours on February 15, 2013. The plant will enter Mode 5 to execute leak repair. Mode 5 entry is expected at approximately 0800 hours on February 16, 2013.'"</p>
<p>No explanation is given as to why this incident, dated Feb. 14, was not publicly reported until Feb. 19.</p>
<p>However, NRC Region 3 spokeswoman Viktoria Mytling told WSBT-TV in South Bend, IN that "NRC resident inspectors at Palisades have been aware of a leak from the cooling water system and followed the plant&rsquo;s actions to find the location after the leakage increased from 2 to 35 gallons an hour in less than a week."</p>
<p>No explanation is given for the disparity between Mytling's 35 gallon per hour figure, and the NRC incident report's 40 gallon per hour figure, above.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mlive.com/news/kalamazoo/index.ssf/2013/02/palisades_nuclear_power_plant_12.html" target="_blank">The&nbsp;<em>Kalamazoo Gazette</em>&nbsp;</a>quotes Mytling as admitting that the leakage began as early as Feb. 8. NRC has provided no explanation as to why the public was not informed about the problem for 11 days.&nbsp;</p>
<p>(Last year, U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) demanded an NRC investigation into Mytling's downplaying of a reactor leak at the troubled Davis-Besse atomic reactor near Toledo. In addition, Chicago watchdog group Nuclear Energy Information Service, via a Freedom of Information Act Request to the State of Illinois Dept. of Nuclear Safety, documented that Mytling's flip assurance -- that a radioactive steam leak at the Byron atomic reactor must have contained exceedingly low levels of hazardous radioactive tritium, as radiation monitors had not detected any -- was baseless and misleading, as no real-time tritium monitoring capability existed at the plant.)</p>
<p>However, an 11 day delay in informing the public is nothing new, in light of Entergy and NRC behavior at Palisades in recent years. For example, in June, 2012, courageous Palisades whistleblowers and their attorney, Billie Pirner Garde of Washington D.C., working with U.S. Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA), made public a leak into Palisades' safety critical control room (where electrical circuitry and equipment cannot be allowed to get wet) that had been ongoing for more than a year, with leakage being caught in buckets near the central control panel. That leak had been kept not only from the public, but even from the NRC's Chairman, despite his tour of the problem-plagued plant on May 25, 2012. NRC internal investigations supposedly continue as to why the agency's own chairman was kept in the dark about the control room leak. &nbsp;</p>
<p>WSBT has also posted an additional NRC statement about the latest "leak per week" (a phrase coined by watchdogs on Entergy's controversial and troubled Vermont Yankee atomic reactor) at Palisades:</p>
<p>"NRC STATEMENT: WHAT IS THIS LEAK ALL ABOUT?</p>
<p>The leak came from&nbsp;the component cooling water system whose function is to remove heat from pipes, pumps and other equipment running at high temperatures. Workers identified the source of the leak to be one of the plant&rsquo;s two heat exchangers which are a part of this system. Heat exchangers, which consist of about 2,000 tubes each, are used to remove heat during normal operation but also during&nbsp;<strong>potential accident scenarios.&nbsp;</strong>Palisades has two heat exchangers, which cool equipment&nbsp;<strong>important to safety</strong>, and are required to be in working condition. According to NRC regulations, if there is a problem with one of the heat exchangers it would need to be fixed within in [sic] 72 hours.&nbsp; If that&rsquo;s not possible the plant would have to shut down to find and fix the leak. Palisades made the decision to shut down before reaching the established limit.&nbsp; The plant has to repair the heat exchanger before returning online.</p>
<p>NRC resident inspectors, in consultation with our expert in the region, continue to monitor [sic] situation." (Emphasis added.)</p>
<p>Thus, this equipment breakdown does have safety significance.</p>
<p>The&nbsp;<em><a href="http://www.hollandsentinel.com/newsnow/x1037512857/Palisades-Nuclear-Power-Plant-remains-out-of-service" target="_blank">Holland Sentinel</a></em>&nbsp;was perhaps the first news outlet to report on this story.</p>]]></content></entry></feed>