<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.166 (http://www.squarespace.com) on Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:51:15 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>New Reactors</title><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 05:19:29 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.166 (http://www.squarespace.com)</generator><item><title>Warren Buffett finally sees the light: MidAmerican Energy cancels proposed new "small modular reactor" targeted at Iowa</title><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 05:14:46 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/2013/6/4/warren-buffett-finally-sees-the-light-midamerican-energy-can.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">356082:9207108:33849809</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="ssNonEditable full-image-float-left"><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/bilde.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1370322614512" alt="" /><span class="thumbnail-caption">Des Moines Register graphic</span></span><a href="http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20130603/NEWS/306030045/MidAmerican-decides-against-Iowa-nuclear-plant?odyssey=tab%7Ctopnews%7Ctext%7CFrontpage&amp;gcheck=1" target="_blank">As reported by the&nbsp;<em>Des Moines Register</em></a><span>, Warren Buffett's MidAmerican Energy has finally pulled the plug on a proposed new "small modular reactor" it was hoping that the ratepayers of Iowa would pay for, through "Construction Work in Progress" (CWIP) surcharges on their electricity bills. A powerful coalition, including AARP, Green State Solutions, Sierra Club, Friends of the Earth, and others can claim credit for this environmental victory against nuclear industry greed, after a protracted three year long battle at the Iowa state legislature.</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/rss-comments-entry-33849809.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Environmental coalition rebuts challenges against Fermi 3 proposed new reactor contention</title><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 02:05:26 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/2013/5/31/environmental-coalition-rebuts-challenges-against-fermi-3-pr.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">356082:9207108:33838573</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 150px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Terry%20Lodge.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1370052355523" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 150px;">Environmental coalition attorney Terry Lodge of Toledo</span></span>Attorney Terry Lodge of Toledo (photo, left), and expert witness Arnie Gundersen, Chief Engineer at Fairewinds Associates, Inc, have filed a rebuttal against challenges brought by Detroit Edison and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff (NRC) regarding Quality Assurance (QA) contentions in opposition to the proposed new Fermi 3 atomic reactor.</p>
<p>The rebuttal includes&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Rebuttal%20testimony%20Arnie%205.30.13.pdf" target="_blank">expert witness testimony by Gundersen</a>, and an<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/5%2030%2013%20Intvnr%20Rebuttal%20position%20statement%20COMPLET.pdf" target="_blank">"Intervenor's Rebuttal Statement of Position"</a>&nbsp;legal filing by Lodge.</p>
<p>Lodge and Gundersen filed their rebuttal on behalf of an environmental coalition comprised of Beyond Nuclear, Citizens for Alternatives to Chemical Contamination, Citizens Environment Alliance of Southwestern Ontario, Don't Waste Michigan, and the Sierra Club's Michigan Chapter.</p>
<p>Fermi 3 is a proposed new General Electric-Hitachi so-called "ESBWR" ("Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor"), targeted at the Lake Erie shoreline in Monroe County, Michigan, 8 miles as the crow flies (or the radioactivity blows) from Ontario, Canada.</p>
<p>NRC Atomic Safety and Licensing Board hearings are set for Halloween on not only this QA contention, but also&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/home/2013/5/28/environmental-coalition-speaks-for-the-snakes-against-propos.html" target="_blank">an Eastern Fox Snake threatened species contention</a>. In addition, Fermi 3's combined Construction and Operation License Application (COLA) cannot be finalized until NRC completes its court-ordered Environmental Impact Statement on its so-called [High-Level] Nuclear Waste Confidence Rule, a proceeding that could take years.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/rss-comments-entry-33838573.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Environmental coalition expert presses case against Fermi 3 due to major quality assurance violations</title><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 02:19:54 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/2013/5/1/environmental-coalition-expert-presses-case-against-fermi-3.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">356082:9207108:33525649</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 300px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Arnie%20on%20CNN.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1367463441739" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 300px;">Arnie Gundersen has appeared frequently on major news media, including as a regular guest of anchor John King on CNN regarding the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe</span></span>Expert witness Arnie Gundersen (photo, left), Fairewinds Associates, Inc's Chief Nuclear Engineer, with 40 years of experience in industry, has documented yet more violations of quality assurance (QA) at Detroit Edison's proposed new reactor, Fermi 3. His <a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Fairewinds%20Fermi3%20Non-Proprietary%202013-4-30%20FINAL.pdf" target="_blank">"[NON-PROPRIETARY]&nbsp;TESTIMONY OF ARNOLD GUNDERSEN SUPPORTING OF INTERVENORS&nbsp;CONTENTION 15: DTE COLA LACKS STATUTORILY REQUIRED&nbsp;COHESIVE QA PROGRAM"</a>&nbsp;was submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) Atomic Safety (sic) and Licensing Board (ASLB) on April 30, 2013.</p>
<p>Gundersen serves as the expert witness for the QA contention introduced by the environmental coalition opposing Fermi 3, namely: Beyond Nuclear, Citizens for Alternatives to Chemical Contamination, Citizen Environment Alliance of Southwestern Ontario, Don't Waste Michigan, and Sierra Club, Michigan Chapter.</p>
<p>Gundersen's testimony applies to non-proprietary documentation revealing DTE's QA breakdowns over the past several years, the repercussions of which continue today. Gundersen also prepared a non-public analysis of DTE's <em>proprietary</em> documents, as well, and states in his non-proprietary, publicly available testimony:</p>
<p>"...after reviewing much of the material that DTE had labeled proprietary,&nbsp;Fairewinds has found no basis for Detroit Edison to designate these documents as&nbsp;proprietary, other than to avoid embarrassment if its own mistakes were shared&nbsp;with the public.</p>
<p>In Fairewinds Associates, Inc&rsquo;s opinion, Detroit Edison&rsquo;s&nbsp;labeling non-proprietary material as proprietary is an abuse of the public&rsquo;s right to&nbsp;know how mismanaged the 'Fermi 3 Licensing Project' is."</p>
<p>Gundersen's non-proprietary, publicly available testimony went on:</p>
<p>"The data Fairewinds reviewed shows that confusion and lack of&nbsp;organizational control reigned within Detroit Edison for years prior to the COLA [combined Construction and Operations License Application]&nbsp;submittal and to this day. These early QA problems are the root cause of the&nbsp;current site characterization issues that continue to plague the Fermi 3 Licensing&nbsp;Project...In my opinion, this extensive breakdown in nuclear Quality Assurance that&nbsp;endangered the geotechnical work in 2007 continues to plague the Fermi 3&nbsp;Licensing Project today."</p>
<p>Gundersen is refering to significant problems DTE has encountered in the area of Soil Structures Analysis, which has potential seismic risk significance.</p>
<p>At the same time as he filed Gundersen's testimony, environmental coalition attorney Terry Lodge of Toledo also submitted&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/4%2030%2013%20F3%20QA%20Intvnr%20initial%20position%20statement-1.pdf" target="_blank">Intervenors' Initial Statement of Position</a>&nbsp;on the QA contention.</p>
<p>DTE and NRC Staff, both advocating for approval of the COLA, also filed their own testimonies and statements of position by the April 30th deadline. <a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/4%2030%2013%20DTE%20Electrics%20Initial%20Statement%20of%20Position%20on%20Contention%2015%20QA%204-30-2013.pdf" target="_blank">DTE's Initial Statement of Position</a> was accompanied by <a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/4%2030%2013%20Initial%20Written%20Testimony%20of%20DTE%20Electric%204-30-13%20QA%20DTE000015.pdf" target="_blank">testimonies from&nbsp;Peter Smith, Stanley Stasek,&nbsp;Ronald Sacco, and Steven Thomas</a>.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/4%2030%2013%20NRC%20Staff%20Initial%20Statement%20of%20Position%204-30-13%20QA.pdf" target="_blank">NRC Staff's Initial Statement of Position</a> was accompanied by testimonies from <a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/4%2030%2013%20Testimony%20of%20Adrian%20Muniz%204-30-13%20QA.pdf" target="_blank">Adrian Muniz</a>, <a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/4%2030%2013%20Testimony%20of%20Aida%20Rivera-Varona%204-30-13%20QA.pdf" target="_blank">Aida Rivera-Varona</a>, and <a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/4%2030%2013%20Testimony%20of%20George%20Lipscomb%204-30-13%20QA.pdf" target="_blank">George Lipscomb</a>.&nbsp;A formal hearing on the QA contention will be heard by the NRC ASLB later this year.</p>
<p>Also on April 30th, ironically enough, <a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/4%2030%2013%20ASLB%20Denial%20of%20FEIS%20related%20Contentions%20April%2030%202013.pdf" target="_blank">the Fermi 3 ASLB rejected several proposed intervention contentions the environmental coalition had submitted in response to NRC's Final Environmental Impact Statement</a> on the proposed new reactor. See the website post below for more information on these now-rejected proposed contentions.</p>
<p>Despite this, the environmental coalition's contention in defense of Fermi 3's impacts on the threatened Eastern Fox Snake, and its critical habitat, proceeds towards a formal hearing before the ASLB later this year.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/rss-comments-entry-33525649.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Environmental coalition defends contentions against Fermi 3 proposed new reactor, challenges adequacy of NRC FEIS</title><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 04:05:58 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/2013/3/27/environmental-coalition-defends-contentions-against-fermi-3.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">356082:9207108:33155328</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 200px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Terry%20Lodge.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1364357774189" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 200px;">Environmental coalition attorney Terry Lodge</span></span>Terry Lodge (photo, left), Toledo-based attorney representing an environmental coalition opposing the proposed new Fermi 3 atomic reactor targeted at the Lake Erie shore in Monroe County, MI, has filed&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Fermi%20Intervenors%20Reply%20March%2025%202013%20Contentions%203%2013%2023%2026%2027%20downloadAttachment.pdf" target="_blank">a reply to challenges</a>&nbsp;from Detroit Edison (DTE) and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff. The coalition includes Beyond Nuclear, Citizen Environment Alliance of Southwestern Ontario, Citizens for Alternatives to Chemical Contamination, Don't Waste Michigan, and the Sierra Club Michigan Chapter.</p>
<p>The coalition's reply re-asserted "no confidence" in DTE's ability to safely store Class B and C "low-level" radioactive wastes on-site at Fermi 3 into the indefinite future, due to the lack of sure access to a disposal facility. It also again emphasized the lack of documented need for the 1,550 Megawatts of electricity Fermi 3 would generate. And the coalition alleged that NRC has failed to fulfill its federal responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as by the illegal "segmentation" of the needed transmission line corridor from the rest of the Fermi 3 reactor construction and operation proposal.</p>
<p>This legal filing follows by a week upon the submission of public comments about NRC's Fermi 3 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS).&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Fermi%203%20FEIS%20Comments%20Jessie%20Pauline%20Collins%20Don%27t%20Waste%20Michigan.pdf" target="_blank">The comments, commissioned by Don't Waste Michigan and prepared by Jessie Pauline Collins</a>, were endorsed by a broad coalition of individuals and environmental groups, including Beyond Nuclear. The FEIS comments included satellite images of harmful&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Lake%20Erie%20algae%202012.pdf" target="_blank">algal blooms in Lake Erie in 2012</a>, and in&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Lake%20Erie%20Satellite%20Images%20algae%20monroe%202011%202012.pdf" target="_blank">2011 to 2012</a>, attributable in significant part to thermal electric power plants such as Detroit Edison's Monroe (coal burning) Power Plant, at 3,300 Megawatts-electric the second largest coal burner in the U.S. Fermi 3's thermal discharge into Lake Erie will worsen this already very serious ecological problem.</p>
<p>In the very near future, the environmental coalition intervening against the Fermi 3 combined Construction and Operating License Application (COLA) will submit additional filings on its contentions challenging the lack of adequate quality assurance (QA, regarding which nuclear engineer Arnie Gundersen of Fairewinds Associates in Vermont serves as the coalition's expert witness) on the project, as well as its defense of the threatened Eastern Fox Snake and its critical wetlands habitat. The State of Michigan has stated that Fermi 3's construction would represent the largest impact on Great Lakes coastal wetlands in the history of state wetlands preservation law.&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/rss-comments-entry-33155328.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Half a billion dollars already wasted on small modular reactors</title><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:00:13 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/2013/3/5/half-a-billion-dollars-already-wasted-on-small-modular-react.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">356082:9207108:32922092</guid><description><![CDATA[<div class="journal-entry-text">
<div class="body">
<div><span class="ssNonEditable full-image-block"><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/post-images/goldenfleeceimage1.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1362509985785" alt="" /></span>The federal government is in the process of wasting more than half a billion dollars to pay large, profitable companies for what should be their own expenses for research &amp; development (R&amp;D) and licensing related to &ldquo;small modular reactors&rdquo; (SMRs), which would be about a third of the size or less of today&rsquo;s large nuclear reactors.&nbsp; In response, the nonpartisan group Taxpayers for Common Sense today handed out its latest &ldquo;Golden Fleece Award&rdquo; to the Department of Energy for the dollars being wasted on SMRs.</div>
<div>Titled &ldquo;Taxpayer Subsidies for Small Modular Reactors,&rdquo; a related TCS background report is available online&nbsp;<a href="http://www.taxpayer.net/library/article/taxpayer-subsidies-for-small-modular-reactors" target="_blank">here</a>.</div>
<p>There is no assurance that electricity produced by an SMR would be competitive with otehr sources and there are no reliable cost estimates for SMRs. Traditional light water reactors are already seeing costs soar at the few construction sites around the world.</p>
<div></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="journal-entry-tag-post-body journal-entry-tag"></div>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/rss-comments-entry-32922092.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Fermi 3 Final Environmental Impact Statement incomplete: intervenors reveal major inadequacies; NRC announces major delays in Safety Evaluation Report; major setbacks projected</title><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:22:18 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/2013/2/20/fermi-3-final-environmental-impact-statement-incomplete-inte.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">356082:9207108:32848336</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/esbwr.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1361399572824" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 250px;">An artist's rendition of the ESBWR targeted to be built at Fermi 3</span></span></p>
<p>On Feb. 19, 2013, the environmental coalition intervening in opposition to the construction and operation of Detroit Edison's proposed new Fermi 3 atomic reactor filed new and amended contentions in response to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Final Environmental Impact Statement about the proposal. <a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/FINAL%20DRAFT%20FEIS%20Press%20Release%202%2021%2013.pdf" target="_blank">The coalition issued a news release.</a></p>
<p>Documents related to environmental intervenors' filing of Feb. 19, 2013 in opposition to the General Electric-Hitachi so-called "Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor" (or ESBWR, see image, left) proposed to be constructed and operated at the Fermi nuclear power plant in Monroe County, Michigan, on the Lake Erie &nbsp;shoreline, as well as documents reveal the major schedule delays afflicting the project:</p>
<p>Intervenors' Feb. 19, 2013 <a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/ASLB%20Fermi%203%20Motion%20for%20Admission%20313232627%20downloadAttachment.pdf" target="_blank">"MOTION FOR RESUBMISSION OF CONTENTIONS 3 AND 13,&nbsp;FOR RESUBMISSION OF CONTENTION 23 OR ITS ADMISSION&nbsp;AS A NEW CONTENTION, AND FOR ADMISSION OF NEW&nbsp;CONTENTIONS 26 AND 27"</a>;</p>
<p>Current&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Fermi%203%20COLA%20Review%20Schedule%20-%202-15-13.pdf" target="_blank">Fermi 3 COLA Review Schedule</a>&nbsp;(Feb. 15, 2013), showing 2 years and 10 month of delay;</p>
<p>Original&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Fermi%203%20Schedule%206-30-09.pdf" target="_blank">Fermi 3 Schedule </a>(June 30, 2009).</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/rss-comments-entry-32848336.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>"Endangered Snakes Prompt Hearing Over Fermi 3 Nuclear Plant"</title><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 18:05:06 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/2013/2/5/endangered-snakes-prompt-hearing-over-fermi-3-nuclear-plant.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">356082:9207108:32753614</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 300px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/fox_snake1_t670.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1360087576020" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 300px;">An Eastern Fox Snake, an endangered constrictor species indigenous to southeast Michigan</span></span><a href="http://www.monroenews.com/news/2013/feb/05/endangered-snakes-prompt-hearing-over-fermi-3-nucl/" target="_blank">The&nbsp;<em>Monroe Evening News</em>&nbsp;has reported</a>&nbsp;on an environmental coalition's successful bid for hearing before the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) in opposition to Detroit Edison's proposed new Fermi 3 atomic reactor on the Lake Erie shore of southeast Michigan.</p>
<p>The coalition is comprised of Beyond Nuclear, Citizens for Alternatives to Chemical Contamination, Citizens Environment Alliance of Southwestern Ontario, Don't Waste Michigan, and Sierra Club Michigan Chapter.</p>
<p>It contends that the nuclear utility, federal government, and State of Michigan are failing to protect the endangered Eastern Fox Snake species (see photo, left) from extinction due to habitat destruction caused by the construction and operation of a 1,550 Megawatt-electric General Electric Hiticahi so-called "Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor" (ESBWR), as well as an associated 11-mile long, 300-foot wide transmission line corridor.</p>
<p>The State of Michigan has admitted the reactor construction will involve the largest impact on Great Lakes coastal wetlands in the history of state environmental protection law. Combined with the transmission line's destruction of more than 1,000 acres of undeveloped land, including forests and wetlands, the coalition contends the habitat loss could extirpate the endangered Eastern Fox Snake species in the region.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/2013/1/30/eastern-fox-snake-contention-against-fermi-3-moves-to-eviden.html" target="_blank">More.</a>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/rss-comments-entry-32753614.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Eastern Fox Snake contention against Fermi 3 moves to evidentiary hearing stage</title><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 03:06:37 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/2013/1/30/eastern-fox-snake-contention-against-fermi-3-moves-to-eviden.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">356082:9207108:32730408</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/dont%20tread%20on%20me.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1359602811720" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 279px;">Fermi 3, Don't Tread on Me!</span></span><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/ASLB%20Eastern%20Fox%20Snake%20ruling%201%2030%202013.pdf" target="_blank">ASLB ruling</a> (Jan. 30, 2013)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Eastern%20Fox%20Snake%20press%20release%201%2031%202013.pdf" target="_blank">Environmental coalition press release</a><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/1%2031%202013%20final%20draft%20Eastern%20Fox%20Snake%20press%20release.pdf" target="_blank"> </a>(Jan. 31, 2013)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Additional%20Background%20on%20Eastern%20Fox%20Snake.pdf" target="_blank">Additional Background on Eastern Fox Snake and Other Contentions</a> (Jan. 31, 2013)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/11%2029%202012%20Interveners%20response%20to%20DTE%20mtn%20for%20reconsideration%20Eastern%20Fox%20Snake.pdf" target="_blank">Environmental interveners' response to DTE's Motion for Reconsideration of Eastern Fox Snake contention</a> (November 29, 2012)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/11%2019%202012%20DTE%20Motion%20for%20ASLB%20Reconsideration%20Eastern%20Fox%20Snake.pdf" target="_blank">DTE's Motion for Reconsideration to ASLB on Eastern Fox Snake contention</a> (November 19, 2012)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/home/2012/7/2/fermi-3-dont-tread-on-me.html" target="_blank">Environmental coalition's earlier defense of its Eastern Fox Snake contention</a> (July 2, 2012)</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/rss-comments-entry-32730408.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>The nuclear relapse has derailed -- literally!</title><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 23:51:49 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/2013/1/22/the-nuclear-relapse-has-derailed-literally.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">356082:9207108:32613887</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/t300-Vogtle%20train%209%20Savannah%201.13.2013.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1358898757501" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 300px;">Photo by Tom Clements, Alliance for Nuclear Accountability (ANA)</span></span>Tom Clements of Alliance for Nuclear Accountability in South Carolina has documented, in photo and blog, a most remarkable development: the AP1000 nuclear reactor vessel targeted at Vogtle, Georgia has been discovered unprotected, stranded in Savannah Port since a December 15 shipment failure.&nbsp;<a href="http://aikenleader.villagesoup.com/p/vogtle-ap1000-nuclear-reactor-vessel-discovered-unprotected-stranded-in-savannah-port-since-decembe/948156" target="_blank">Tom's remarkable blog is posted at the&nbsp;<em>Aiken Leader.</em></a>&nbsp;<em>Connect Savannah</em>&nbsp;has also reported on the&nbsp;<a href="http://www.connectsavannah.com/news/article/108071/" target="_blank">"Nuclear Train Wreck."</a></p>
<p>As Tom has described it: the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) for the chronically delayed Vogtle AP1000 reactor construction project near Waynesboro, Georgia sits stranded and seemingly unprotected in the port of Savannah. The special railroad car carrying the 300-ton vessel had unknown mechanical problems on December 15 on exiting the port.&nbsp; The NRC has said that the vessel only got one-quarter mile before a sound was heard and the car stopped.&nbsp; Plans by Westinghouse and Southern Company to move the vessel are unknown. It is also unknown if the railroad car can be repaired and used or if the railroad company which owns the line is concerned that the rail car might break down again on its line in an in accessible place.&nbsp; Meanwhile, the apparently unguarded reactor might be subject to sabotage and sits in apparent violation of NRC quality assurance and "administrative control" regulations.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/rss-comments-entry-32613887.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Forbes: "the nuclear renaissance may be largely over before it started,"</title><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 20:54:16 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/2013/1/17/forbes-the-nuclear-renaissance-may-be-largely-over-before-it.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">356082:9207108:32573610</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 300px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/BurningMoneyFLAT.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1364572704285" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 300px;">"Burning Money" image by Gene Case, Avenging Angels</span></span>Peter Kelly-Detwiler, Contributor to&nbsp;<em>Forbes</em>, has published an op-ed entitled&nbsp;<a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterdetwiler/2013/01/15/new-centralized-nuclear-plants-still-an-investment-worth-making/" target="_blank">"New Centralized Nuclear Plants: Still an Investment Worth Making?"</a>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The&nbsp;<em>Forbes&nbsp;</em>contributor concludes that "the nuclear renaissance may be largely over before it started," with not only the vast majority of proposed new reactors in the U.S. being cancelled, but even paid-off old reactors like Kewaunee in Wisconsin being permanently shutdown due to crushing economics -- such as the expense of major, vitally needed safety repairs at the 40-year old reactor.</p>
<p>Kelly-Detwiler cites the "takes too long," "costs too much," and "bet-the-farm" nature of nuclear power for the "failure to launch" of the nuclear relapse.</p>
<p>If the op-ed's title is meant to imply that so-called small modular reactors might still save the day for the retreating nuclear power industry, it must be pointed out that the supposed justification for giant-sized proposed new reactors (such as the AP1000, at 1,100 MWe; the ESBWR at 1,500 MWe; the EPR at 1,600 MWe; etc.) was "economies of scale." Since small modular reactors represent the opposite end of the spectrum, it stands to reason these would be even&nbsp;<em>more expensive</em>&nbsp;than their super-sized, failed siblings.</p>
<p>In a classic February 14, 1985 piece entitled&nbsp;&ldquo;Nuclear Follies,&rdquo;&nbsp;<em>Forbes</em>&nbsp;wrote:&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>"The failure of the U.S. nuclear power program ranks as the largest managerial disaster in business history, a disaster on a monumental scale. The utility industry has already invested $125 billion in nuclear power, with an additional $140 billion to come before the decade is out, and only the blind, or the biased, can now think that the money has been well spent. It is a defeat for the U.S. consumer and for the competitiveness of U.S. industry, for the utilities that undertook the program and for the private enterprise system that made it possible.&rdquo;&nbsp;</em><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/nuclear-subsidies/2013/1/17/forbes-the-nuclear-renaissance-may-be-largely-over-before-it.html" target="_blank">More.</a></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/rss-comments-entry-32573610.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>