<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.159 (http://www.squarespace.com) on Sat, 25 May 2013 20:16:33 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>"Low-Level"</title><subtitle>"Low-Level"</subtitle><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/atom.xml"/><updated>2013-03-27T19:37:15Z</updated><generator uri="http://five.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.159 (http://www.squarespace.com)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>Environmental coalition defends contentions against Fermi 3 proposed new reactor, challenges adequacy of NRC FEIS</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2013/3/27/environmental-coalition-defends-contentions-against-fermi-3.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2013/3/27/environmental-coalition-defends-contentions-against-fermi-3.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-03-27T04:09:16Z</published><updated>2013-03-27T04:09:16Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 200px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Terry%20Lodge.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1364358009068" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 200px;">Environmental coalition attorney Terry Lodge</span></span>Terry Lodge (photo, left), Toledo-based attorney representing an environmental coalition opposing the proposed new Fermi 3 atomic reactor targeted at the Lake Erie shore in Monroe County, MI, has filed&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Fermi%20Intervenors%20Reply%20March%2025%202013%20Contentions%203%2013%2023%2026%2027%20downloadAttachment.pdf" target="_blank">a reply to challenges</a>&nbsp;from Detroit Edison (DTE) and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff.</p>
<p><strong>The coalition's reply re-asserted "no confidence" in DTE's ability to safely stored Class B and C "low-level" radioactive wastes on-site at Fermi 3 into the indefinite future, due to the lack of sure access to a disposal facility.</strong> it also again emphasized the lack of documented need for the 1,550 Megawatts of electricity Fermi 3 would generate. And the coalition alleged that NRC has failed to fulfill its federal responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as by the illegal "segmentation" of the needed transmission line corridor from the rest of the Fermi 3 reactor construction and operation proposal.</p>
<p>This legal filing follows by a week upon the submission of public comments about NRC's Fermi 3 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS).&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Fermi%203%20FEIS%20Comments%20Jessie%20Pauline%20Collins%20Don%27t%20Waste%20Michigan.pdf" target="_blank">The comments, commissioned by Don't Waste Michigan and prepared by Jessie Pauline Collins</a>, were endorsed by a broad coalition of individuals and environmental groups, including Beyond Nuclear. The FEIS comments included satellite images of harmful&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Lake%20Erie%20algae%202012.pdf" target="_blank">algal blooms in Lake Erie in 2012</a>, and in&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Lake%20Erie%20Satellite%20Images%20algae%20monroe%202011%202012.pdf" target="_blank">2011 to 2012</a>, attributable in significant part to thermal electric power plants such as Detroit Edison's Monroe (coal burning) Power Plant, at 3,300 Megawatts-electric the second largest coal burner in the U.S. Fermi 3's thermal discharge into Lake Erie will worsen this already very serious ecological problem.</p>
<p>In the very near future, the environmental coalition intervening against the Fermi 3 combined Construction and Operating License Application (COLA) will submit additional filings on its contentions challenging the lack of adequate quality assurance (QA) on the project, as well as its defense of the threatened Eastern Fox Snake and its critical wetlands habitat. The State of Michigan has stated that Fermi 3's construction would represent the largest impact on Great Lakes coastal wetlands in the history of state wetlands preservation law.&nbsp;</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Stop the Great Lakes Nuclear Dump!</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2013/2/4/stop-the-great-lakes-nuclear-dump.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2013/2/4/stop-the-great-lakes-nuclear-dump.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-02-04T18:35:41Z</published><updated>2013-02-04T18:35:41Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 400px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/STGLND-BILLBOARDndx2.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1360003000637" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 400px;">Stop the Great Lakes Nuclear Dump billboard in Toronto</span></span></p>
<p>A new group has formed in opposition to the radioactive waste dump(s) targeted at the Great Lakes shoreline near the Bruce Nuclear Complex in Kincardine, Ontario, Canada. Stop the Great Lakes Nuclear Dump has&nbsp;<a href="http://www.stopthegreatlakesnucleardump.com/" target="_blank">a website,</a>&nbsp;and has launched&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/stopthegreatlakesnucleardump.html" target="_blank">a petition drive</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bayshorebroadcasting.ca/news_item.php?NewsID=54487" target="_blank">As reported by Bayshore Broadcasting</a>, Stop the Great Lakes Nuclear Dump has also erected a billboard on the Gardiner Expressway in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), in order to draw wider attention to this national -- and even international -- threat. The report, which includes&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bayshorebroadcasting.ca/downloads/audio/nuke_mmm.mp3" target="_blank">a short audio recording</a>&nbsp;of Stop the Great Lakes Nuclear Dump spokeswoman, Beverly Fernandez, points out "The billboard, on one of Canada&rsquo;s busiest commuter strips, could be seen by up to one million people a week."</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/stopthegreatlakesnucleardump.html" target="_blank">Stop the Great Lakes Nuclear Dump encourages U.S. citizens to sign their petition</a>. The petition is directed to Canada's Minister of the Environment, Peter Kent.</p>
<p>The Bruce Nuclear Complex "hosts" a total of 9 reactors (including a permanently shutdown prototype), one of the single biggest nuclear power plants, and concentrations of radioactive waste, in the world. For decades, all of Ontario's 20 reactors have "temporarily" stored their so-called "low" and "intermediate" level radioactive wastes at Bruce. Low-level radioactive waste has been incinerated. Now, Ontario Power Generation (OPG) proposes burying these low- and intermediate-level radioactive wastes on-site, just 400 meters from the waters of Lake Huron.</p>
<p>To make matters worse, Canada's Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) is considering applications from several Bruce area municipalities, which are volunteering to "host" a national high-level radioactive waste dump for all of Canada's 22 atomic reactors. These communities are disproportionately populated by Bruce Nuclear workers. They stand to receive substantial sums of money for being studied, and perhaps ultimately selected, as Canada's national high-level radioactive waste dumpsite. Kincardine, Bruce's "home town," has already received millions of dollars for agreeing to "host" OPG's proposed "low" and "intermediate" level radioactive waste burial dump at the Bruce Nuclear Complex.</p>
<p>In addition to the Bruce region, a number of municipalities in Canada's Lake Superior basin, and further north and west (including the Province of Saskatchewan, with one of the world's single biggest uranium mining industries), have also "volunteered" to "host" Canada's high-level radioactive waste dump.</p>
<p>Proponents have dubbed these proposed dumps "Deep Geologic Repositories," or DGRs. Critics refer to them, sarcastically, as Deep Underground Dumps, or&nbsp;<strong><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">DUDs.</span></em></strong></p>
<p>The Great Lakes comprises 20% of the world's surface fresh water. It serves as the drinking water supply for 40 million people in 8 U.S. states (from west to east, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New York), 2 Canadian provinces (Ontario and Quebec), and a large number of Native American First Nations.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Arnie Gundersen on health hazards of "recycling" radioactive metals into consumer products</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2013/1/18/arnie-gundersen-on-health-hazards-of-recycling-radioactive-m.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2013/1/18/arnie-gundersen-on-health-hazards-of-recycling-radioactive-m.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-01-19T00:14:18Z</published><updated>2013-01-19T00:14:18Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/arnie.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1358554496080" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 87px;">Fairewinds' nuclear engineer Arnie Gundersen</span></span>In the most recent Fairewinds Energy Education weekly podcast,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.fairewinds.com/content/repairs-four-nuclear-reactors-are-so-expensive-they-should-not-be-restarted" target="_blank">"REPAIRS AT FOUR NUCLEAR REACTORS ARE SO EXPENSIVE THAT THEY SHOULD NOT BE RESTARTED,"</a>&nbsp;<span>Fairewinds' nuclear engineer Arnie Gundersen (photo, left) lays out the case as to why the atomic reactors at Fort Calhoun, Nebraska on the Missouri River, Crystal River in Florida, and San Onofre Units 2 &amp; 3 in southern California should all be permanently shutdown.</span></p>
<p><span>Of these,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications.html" target="_blank">Fort Calhoun had already gotten a 20-year license extension rubberstamp by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, while Crystal River was deep into the application process for one.</a></span></p>
<p><strong>In the second half of the program, Arnie also discusses a recent&nbsp;<a href="http://markey.house.gov/sites/markey.house.gov/files/documents/2013-01-11_DOE_RadioActive_ScrapMetal.pdf" target="_blank">letter to U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu</a>, and an accompanying&nbsp;<a href="http://markey.house.gov/press-release/markey-questions-doe&rsquo;s-radioactive-recycling-proposal" target="_blank">press release</a>, from U.S. Representative Ed Markey (D-MA), which expressed strong opposition to U.S. Department of Energy plans to "recycle" radioactive metals and other materials from its nuclear facilities (such as nuclear weapons complex sites, uranium enrichment facilities, national labs, etc.) into consumer products.</strong></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Deep Trouble -- Nuclear Waste Burial in the Great Lakes Basin</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2012/9/28/deep-trouble-nuclear-waste-burial-in-the-great-lakes-basin.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2012/9/28/deep-trouble-nuclear-waste-burial-in-the-great-lakes-basin.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2012-09-28T21:58:01Z</published><updated>2012-09-28T21:58:01Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 250px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/greatlakes600%20Cloudless%20Day.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1348869544291" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 250px;">The Great Lakes comprise 20% of the world's surface fresh water, and provide drinking water to 40 million people in 8 U.S. states, 2 Canadian provinces, and a large number of Native American/First Nations</span></span>Brennain Lloyd of Northwatch and John Jackson of Great Lakes United will speak at an event,&nbsp;<em>Deep Trouble -- Nuclear Waste Burial in the Great Lakes Basin</em>, sponsored by the St. Clair County Community College and the Blue Water Sierra Club on Sept. 30th in Port Huron, MI.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The nuclear industry in Canada is currently pursuing approval of their plan to bury 200,000 cubic meters of radioactive waste below the Bruce Nuclear Generating Station on the eastern shore of Lake Huron, and is studying 21 different communities -- 15 of them in the Great Lakes basin -- as possible burial locations for all of Canada's high level nuclear fuel waste.</p>
<p>The presentation will include descriptions of the burial schemes, the hazards for the Great Lakes community, and possible transportation risks, and linkages to U.S. nuclear waste issues.</p>
<p>For more information, please contact Kay Cumbow, Blue Water Sierra Club, (810) 346-4513 or kcumbow@greatlakes.net.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/canada/2012/9/28/deep-trouble-nuclear-waste-burial-in-the-great-lakes-basin.html" target="_blank">More.</a></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Saugeen Ojibway Nations challenge the targeting of their traditional territory for a high-level radioactive waste dump</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2012/9/3/saugeen-ojibway-nations-challenge-the-targeting-of-their-tra.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2012/9/3/saugeen-ojibway-nations-challenge-the-targeting-of-their-tra.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2012-09-03T22:33:51Z</published><updated>2012-09-03T22:33:51Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 200px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/saugeen%20indian%20ojibway%20nation%20logo_copy_2_1842.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1346711675550" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 200px;">Saugeen First Nation logo</span></span>The Saugeen Ojibway Nations (SON, the&nbsp;<a href="http://www.saugeenfirstnation.ca/" target="_blank">Chippewas of Saugeen First Nation</a>&nbsp;and the&nbsp;<a href="http://nawash.ca/" target="_blank">Chippewas of Nawash Unceded First Nation)</a>&nbsp;live on the Lake Huron shoreline of Ontario. Their Communal Lands are just 30 kilometers (18.6 miles) from the Bruce Nuclear Complex. With a total of 9 atomic reactors (8 operable, 1 permanently shutdown), as well as "centralized interim storage" (including incineration!) for&nbsp;<em>all</em>&nbsp;of Ontario's 20 atomic reactors' "low" and "intermediate" level radioactive wastes, Bruce is amongst the world's single largest nuclear sites.&nbsp;</p>
<p>But now a Deep Geologic Repository (DGR) for&nbsp;<em>burying&nbsp;</em>all of Ontario's "low" and "intermediate" level radioactive wastes has been proposed by Ontario Power Generation (OPG), owner of Ontario's 20 atomic reactors.&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/SON%20Application%20re%20Cumulative%20Effects.pdf" target="_blank">As the SON have submitted to the Canadian nuclear establishment</a>, the likelihood that its traditional lands are also targeted for Canada's national HIGH-level radioactive waste dump (for all of Ontario's, Quebec's, and New Brunswick's irradiated nuclear fuel) means that OPG's Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the DGR is illegally deficient, failing to consider the cumulative impacts associated with the potential for this high-level radioactive waste DGR in the immediate vicinity of Bruce.</p>
<p>The Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO), comprised of Canada's nuclear utilities, has been hired by OPG to represent it in the "low"/"intermediate" DGR Environmental Assessment proceeding, and is also in charge of the high-level radioactive waste dump site search in Canada. NWMO has entered into ever deepening stages of consideration for locating Canada's national high-level radioactive waste dump at any of five municipalities surrounding the site of the proposed Bruce DGR, namely:&nbsp;Saugeen Shores, Brockton, Huron-Kinloss, South Bruce and Arran-Elderslie.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Dr. Gordon Edwards speaks against Canadian national high-level radioactive waste dump on Great Lakes shoreline</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2012/9/3/dr-gordon-edwards-speaks-against-canadian-national-high-leve.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2012/9/3/dr-gordon-edwards-speaks-against-canadian-national-high-leve.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2012-09-03T18:52:00Z</published><updated>2012-09-03T18:52:00Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/edwardsWebth.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1346698378036" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 75px;">Dr. Gordon Edwards, president of CCNR.</span></span><a href="http://www.saugeentimes.com/335%20Sandy/Feature%20Gordon%20Edwards%20speaks%20to%20SOSSRA%20Aug%2019%202012/Template.htm" target="_blank">As reported by the&nbsp;<em>Saugeen Times</em>,</a>&nbsp;Dr. Gordon Edwards (pictured, left), president of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility, spoke at an event sponsored by <a href="http://saveoursaugeenshores.org/" target="_blank">Southampton Residents Association-Save Our Saugeen Shores (SRASOS)</a> on the Ontario shoreline of Lake Huron near the Bruce Nuclear Power Complex. He was joined by John Jackson, acting Executive Director of Great Lakes United. SRASOS opposes the Canadian national high-level radioactive waste dump targeted at Saugeen Shores, Ontario, as well as number of other communities nearby Bruce. In addition to the targeted communities on Ontario's Lake Huron shoreline, additional Canadian communities on Lake Superior's shoreline have also been targeted, as well as yet more in Saskatchewan. The selected high-level radioactive waste dump would then permanently host all of the irradiated nuclear fuel from all of Canada's nuclear power plants (20 reactors in Ontario, 1 in Quebec, and 1 in New Brunswick).</p>
<p>This proposed high-level radioactive waste dump is supposedly different than and distinct from the "Deep Geologic Repository" (DGR) for "low" and "intermediate" level radioactive wastes, also targeted at the Bruce Nuclear Complex itself by Ontario Power Generation, the provincial nuclear utility which owns 20 atomic reactors. But of course, how different and distinct can two such dumps be, located so close together?! And with DGR "storage space" astronomically expensive, as shown by the proposed Yucca Mountain, Nevada, high-level radioactive waste repository and its estimated nearly $100 billion price tag, how could two DGRs located very close together, rather than just one consolidated DGR, be economically justified?!</p>
<p>Beyond Nuclear's Kevin Kamps, a long-time member of the Great Lakes United (GLU) Nuclear-Free/Green Energy Task Force, is serving as an expert witness for GLU in the environmental assessment proceeding regarding the proposed DGR.</p>
<p>To confuse the two proposals yet more, the Nuclear Waste Management Organziation (NWMO), comprised of Canadian nuclear utilities, is in charge of both the high-level and DGR dump proposals.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>"Ukrainian environmentalist brutally beaten to death"</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2012/8/17/ukrainian-environmentalist-brutally-beaten-to-death.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2012/8/17/ukrainian-environmentalist-brutally-beaten-to-death.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2012-08-17T20:29:56Z</published><updated>2012-08-17T20:29:56Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 200px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/volodymyr-302x297.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1345235439919" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 200px;">Volodymyr Goncharenko</span></span><a href="http://www.ejolt.org/2012/08/ukrainian-environmentalist-brutally-beaten-to-death/" target="_blank">EJOLT (Environmental Justice Organizations, Liabilities and Trade) reports</a>&nbsp;the horrific news that, four days after conducting a press conference to warn that 180 tons of dangerous chemical&nbsp;and radioactive industrial waste had arrived at the city of Kryvyi Rih (in the Dnipropetrovsk area of Ukraine), which was likely to be "recycled" into the consumer product stream, 57 year old Volodymyr Goncharenko (photo, left) was brutally beaten to death. He was the Chairman of&nbsp;<a href="http://ecopravo.org.ua/en" target="_blank">Social Movement of Ukraine: For the Rights of Citizens to Environmental Security</a>.</p>
<p>As reported by EJOLT, "According to Goncharenko, during the past several years, scavengers have removed from the Chernobyl exclusion zone 6 million metric tons of scrap metal that was subsequently smelted at metallurgical combines and reprocessed into new metal. While in theory each metallurgical combine should be equipped with radiation-monitoring equipment to check all incoming scrap, financial shortfalls have meant this was rarely the case. In 2007 Ukraine ranked eighth in global steel production and steel is Ukraine&rsquo;s leading export. One can only guess how much radioactive scrap metal has ended up in exported steel."</p>
<p>Pavlo Khazan of the&nbsp;<a href="http://europeangreens.eu/news/death-vladimir-goncharenko" target="_blank">Ukrainian Green Party</a>&nbsp;stated: &ldquo;We collaborated with Volodymyr for 15 years in professional and public areas.&nbsp;The Ukrainian Green Party&nbsp;has no doubt that the murder was linked to his professional activities.&rdquo; Although the Ukrainian police have opened an investigation into Goncharenko's murder,&nbsp;Khazan&nbsp;feels that to deliver justice in this case, international attention and pressure will be needed.</p>
<p>Please contact the Embassy of Ukraine, urging a thorough investigation of Goncharenko's murder, as well as for an end to the "recycling" of radioactive metals and other materials into the consumer product stream.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.mfa.gov.ua/usa/en/36736.htm" target="_blank">In the U.S., the Embassy of Ukraine</a>&nbsp;can be written at 3350 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20007, faxed at (202) 333-0817, or phoned at (202) 349-2920.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.embassyworld.com/embassy/Ukraine/ukraine1.html" target="_blank">Embassies and Consulates of Ukraine elsewhere in the U.S., or in other countries, can also be contacted.</a></p>
<p>Thanks to Nuclear Energy Information Service in Illinois for alerting us to this story.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2012/8/15/resistance-against-radioactive-recycling-across-north-americ.html" target="_blank">Click here</a>&nbsp;to learn more about anti-nuclear resistance to attempts at "radioactive recycling" in North America.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Resistance against "radioactive recycling" across North America and beyond</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2012/8/15/resistance-against-radioactive-recycling-across-north-americ.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2012/8/15/resistance-against-radioactive-recycling-across-north-americ.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2012-08-16T01:48:27Z</published><updated>2012-08-16T01:48:27Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nirs.org/radwaste/outofcontrol/outofcontrol.htm" target="_blank">As reported by NIRS, radioactive metal "recycling" activities in the U.S. have, for several years now, been concentrated in Tennessee.</a>&nbsp;However, the Orwellian-named "NewGreen" has opened for business on Ohio's Lake Erie shoreline, between Davis-Besse and Perry nuclear power plants, hoping to send radioactive metal into the consumer product stream for a profit. For two and a half years, grassroots opposition from Michigan to Quebec and Europe has successfully blocked&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/waste-transportation/2011/2/5/environmentalists-condemn-decision-allowing-radioactive-wast.html" target="_blank">Bruce Nuclear's attempt to "recycle" 64 giant radioactive steam generators into consumer products at Sweden's Studsvik, by shipping them via boat on the Great Lakes and Atlantic.</a>&nbsp;This has happened, despite the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission's rubberstamp for the plan, by&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/canada/2011/2/24/urge-phmsa-to-undertake-programmatic-eis-on-water-borne-radi.html" target="_blank">blocking the U.S. Department of Transportation's Pipelines and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration</a>&nbsp;from approving the shipment, backed by&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/canada/2010/11/24/50-municipalities-representing-over-2-million-quebec-residen.html" target="_blank">hundreds of Quebecois munipalities</a>&nbsp;protesting, and&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/2/9/mohawk-nation-communities-condemn-cnsc-for-approving-radioac.html" target="_blank">Mohawks vowing to physically block the boat on the Saint Lawrence River.</a></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Radioactive dog bowls sold at Chicago &amp; other Illinois Petco Stores</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2012/7/11/radioactive-dog-bowls-sold-at-chicago-other-illinois-petco-s.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2012/7/11/radioactive-dog-bowls-sold-at-chicago-other-illinois-petco-s.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2012-07-11T18:07:19Z</published><updated>2012-07-11T18:07:19Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/radioactive%20dog%20bowls.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1342030093100" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 271px;">Local Chicago television coverage about the radioactive stainless steel dog bowl scare</span></span>As reported by&nbsp;<a href="http://www.treehugger.com/green-home/radioactive-pet-bowls-sold-chicago-petco-store.html" target="_blank">Treehugger</a>&nbsp;and the&nbsp;<em><a href="http://heraldnews.suntimes.com/news/13498299-418/radioactive-bowls-found-at-chicago-pet-store.html" target="_blank">Herald-News</a></em>, the Illinois Emergency Management Agency (IEMA) has reported the discovery of radioactive stainless steel dog bowls at a Petco store in Chicago. It is feared that several radioactively contaminated bowls had been sold. IEMA and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission are supposedly trying to track down those purchased bowls, and IEMA warns shoppers who have purchased stainless steel dog bowls at IL Petcos to contact the store where they purchased the bowl as a precaution. The bowls are reportedly contaminated with radioactive Cobalt-60. Although IEMA was quick to trot out the deceptive "no immediate health risk" line (used by nuclear establishment spokespeople during the Three Mile Island meltdown,&nbsp;<a href="http://glia.ca/2011/radioactive/No_Immediate_Danger%20_Prognosis_for_a_Radioactive_Earth_1990.htm" target="_blank">as documented</a>&nbsp;by&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ccnr.org/Rosalie_Bertell.html" target="_blank">Rosalie Bertell</a>, the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear catastrophe, etc.), as syndicated pet columnist Steve Dale asks, what about pets which have eaten or drank from the contaminated bowls?! Also, no information has been provided on the source of the contamination. However, the nuclear power industry and its friends in government have long attempted to "de-regulate" "low-level" radioactive wastes, which they consider "below regulatory concern."&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nirs.org/radwaste/recycling/recyclinghome.htm" target="_blank">These radioactive wastes, such as radioactive metals, can then be "recycled" into consumer items</a>&nbsp;-- such as dog bowls, or anything made of metal.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Beyond Nuclear wakes U.S. up to Canadian radioactive waste dumps targeted at Great Lakes shoreline</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2012/7/9/beyond-nuclear-wakes-us-up-to-canadian-radioactive-waste-dum.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/low-level/2012/7/9/beyond-nuclear-wakes-us-up-to-canadian-radioactive-waste-dum.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2012-07-10T03:44:36Z</published><updated>2012-07-10T03:44:36Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/bruce%20nuclear%20power%20plant.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1341891960707" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 245px;">With 8 operable and 1 permanently closed prototype, the Bruce Nuclear Complex on the Lake Huron shore in Ontario is currently the biggest nuclear power plant in the world.</span></span><a href="http://www.thestar.com/business/article/1217530--u-s-residents-protest-bruce-nuclear-waste-proposal" target="_blank">The&nbsp;<em>Toronto Star</em>&nbsp;has reported</a>&nbsp;that passionate expressions of opposition to the proposed "low" and "intermediate" level radioactive waste dump targeted at the Bruce Nuclear Complex in Ontario, Canada -- just a half-mile from the Lake Huron shore -- are rolling in from U.S. citizens to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. Weekly email action alerts and website postings by Beyond Nuclear have helped spread the word across the U.S., not just in Michigan -- 50 miles across Lake Huron from Bruce.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Ontario Power Generation, the nuclear utility which owns Bruce and is responsible for radioactive wastes generated at 20 reactors across Ontario, has proposed this "Deep Geologic Repository," which Dave Martin of Greenpeace Canada renamed the DUD (Deep Underground Dump). Beyond Nuclear's Kevin Kamps serves on the Great Lakes United team in opposition to the dump.</p>
<p>At the very same time, several towns near Bruce have volunteered to be considered as Canada's high-level radioactive waste dumping ground, for a total of 22 reactors across Canada. Bruce hosts 9 reactors -- 1 a prototype that has been permanently shut down, and 8 still operable CANDUs (Canadian Uranium Deuterium atomic reactors).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/radioactive-waste-whatsnew/2012/5/31/not-on-our-great-lakes-anti-nuclear-activist-criticizes-prop.html" target="_blank">Kevin also spread the word against these Canadian radioactive waste dumps across Michigan in May, as he spoke at screenings of "Into Eternity" at more than a half dozen communities around the state.</a></p>]]></content></entry></feed>