<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:47:43 GMT--><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rss="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"><rss:channel rdf:about="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/"><rss:title>Human Rights What's New</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/</rss:link><rss:description></rss:description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><dc:date>2012-02-08T14:47:43Z</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.squarespace.com/">Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</admin:generatorAgent><rss:items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2012/2/7/radioactive-tritium-and-toxic-hydrazine-released-immediately.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2012/2/6/fermi-nuclear-power-plants-risks-extend-to-walpole-island-fi.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2012/1/26/brc-report-continues-shameful-history-of-targeting-native-am.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/12/20/lake-huron-tribes-stand-firm-against-proposed-radioactive-wa.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/11/26/nuclear-genocide-at-serpent-river-first-nation-elliot-lake-o.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/11/25/we-left-them-to-die-and-hoped-they-would-never-ask-any-quest.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/8/26/fukushima-parents-and-ngos-appeal-to-un-high-commissioner-fo.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/7/12/defending-western-shoshone-treaty-rights-against-yucca-dump.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/7/3/us-japanese-and-mongolian-nuclear-establishments-conspire-to.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/7/1/court-ruling-an-indirect-ej-victory-for-western-shoshone-ind.html"/></rdf:Seq></rss:items></rss:channel><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2012/2/7/radioactive-tritium-and-toxic-hydrazine-released-immediately.html"><rss:title>Radioactive tritium and toxic hydrazine released immediately adjacent to Prairie Island Indian Community</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2012/2/7/radioactive-tritium-and-toxic-hydrazine-released-immediately.html</rss:link><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-02-07T23:00:03Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/prai.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328655676152" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 250px;">NRC file photo of Prairie Island nuclear power plant</span></span>Xcel Energy's Prairie Island nuclear power plant has made what appears to be two admissions of separate toxic chemical and radiological spills in less than a week.&nbsp;Residents, and the tribal day care center, of the Prairie Island Indian Community are located within hundreds of yards of the nuclear power plant.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/tritium/2012/2/7/two-separate-tritium-and-toxic-chemical-leaks-admitted-by-xc.html" target="_blank">Read more...</a></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2012/2/6/fermi-nuclear-power-plants-risks-extend-to-walpole-island-fi.html"><rss:title>Fermi nuclear power plant's risks extend to Walpole Island First Nation</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2012/2/6/fermi-nuclear-power-plants-risks-extend-to-walpole-island-fi.html</rss:link><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-02-06T23:30:08Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/fermi%202%20nrc%20photo.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328574924890" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 250px;">NRC file photo of Fermi 2, located on the Lake Erie shore</span></span>The Walpole Island First Nation reserve is located on an island in the St. Clair River, between Michigan and Ontario. The Walpole Island First Nation has joined a U.S. and Canadian environmental coalition in expressing concerns about the new "Fermi 3" reactor proposed near Monroe, Michigan. The Fermi nuclear power plant is located just over 50 miles away from Walpole Island First Nation. Its operations, and especially its radioactive, toxic chemical, and thermal releases&nbsp;would also negatively impact fishing, hunting, and other treaty rights due the Walpole Island First Nation.</p>
<p>Other&nbsp;risks and impacts include to <a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/home/2012/2/6/fermi-3-foes-urge-health-analysis.html" target="_blank">health</a>, the impossibility of effectively evacuating all of southeast Michigan, northwest Ohio, and southwest Ontario during a catastrophic radioactivity release -- including the Walpole Island First Nation -- and many other risks and impacts.</p>
<p>Regarding the U.S. and Canadian&nbsp;environmental coalition's -- and allies', including the Walpole Island First Nation's&nbsp;-- recent strong resistance to Fermi 3, including the issues mentioned above, please see:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/2012/2/3/strong-resistance-mounted-against-fermi-3-new-reactor-propos.html" target="_blank">(A comprehenisive, running list of comments, media coverage, and nuclear utility and NRC responses is now posted on Beyond Nuclear's website.)</a></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2012/1/26/brc-report-continues-shameful-history-of-targeting-native-am.html"><rss:title>BRC report continues shameful history of targeting Native American communities for radioactive waste dumps</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2012/1/26/brc-report-continues-shameful-history-of-targeting-native-am.html</rss:link><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-01-27T01:57:08Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Grace%20Thorpe.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1327630822701" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 232px;">Grace Thorpe helped stop dozens of radioactive waste dumps targeted at Native American communities by DOE's Nuclear Waste Negotiator</span></span>Today's<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/BRC_FinalReport_Jan20121.pdf" target="_blank"> final report by the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future</a> (BRC)&nbsp;continued the shameful history of the U.S. nuclear establishment, in both government and industry, of targeting Native American communities for radioactive waste dumps. Beyond Nuclear issued a <a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/radioactive-waste-whatsnew/2012/1/26/beyond-nuclear-response-to-publication-of-report-by-does-blu.html" target="_blank">media statement</a>&nbsp;regarding the BRC report today, and <a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/01/20/the-radioactive-waste-crisis/" target="_blank">an op-ed</a> several days ago. At the very first public meeting of the BRC nearly two years ago,<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/kevin_kamps_comments_to_chu_brc_march_26_2010.pdf" target="_blank"> Beyond Nuclear's Kevin Kamps pleaded this environmental injustice be stopped</a>. To the contrary, BRC's final report points to the U.S. Department of Energy's "Nuclear Waste Negotiator" as a model to be followed again now to advance "consolidated interim storage sites" and repositories. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, DOE's Nuclear Waste Negotiator contacted every single federally recognized Native American tribe in the United States, <a href="http://www.nirs.org/radwaste/scullvalley/historynativecommunitiesnuclearwaste06142005.pdf" target="_blank">then targeted 60 in particular, focusing in the end on Mescalero Apache, New Mexico</a>. It is a testament to the extraordinary efforts of Native American&nbsp;environmental justice activists like Grace Thorpe that all those proposals were defeated, and the Nuclear Waste Negotiator's program eliminated.&nbsp;The nuclear power &nbsp;utilities picked up where the Negotiator left off, <a href="http://www.nirs.org/radwaste/scullvalley/skullvalley.htm" target="_blank">next targeting Skull Valley Goshutes, Utah</a> -- <a href="http://archive.sltrib.com/article.php?id=11336112&amp;itype=storyID" target="_blank">a struggle that continues</a>. Ironically, President Obama praised Grace Thorpe in his <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Womens-History-Month-2009/" target="_blank">"Women Taking the Lead to Save our Planet" Women's History Month Proclamation on March 3, 2009</a>, for launching "a successful campaign to organize Native Americans to oppose the storage of nuclear waste on their reservations" -- only now to have his own DOE's BRC recommend that the Nuclear Waste&nbsp;Negotiator model be&nbsp;revived,&nbsp;&nbsp;including to re-target Native American communities for radioactive waste dumps.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/12/20/lake-huron-tribes-stand-firm-against-proposed-radioactive-wa.html"><rss:title>Lake Huron tribes stand firm against proposed radioactive waste dump</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/12/20/lake-huron-tribes-stand-firm-against-proposed-radioactive-wa.html</rss:link><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-12-21T02:45:06Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 180px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/post-images/ChiefLyleSayers.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1324435680997" alt="" /></span></span>From Sootoday.com: The First Nations of the North Shore Tribal Council strongly reject  the prospect of the North Shore of Lake Huron becoming a site for the  long-term storage of nuclear waste for the Nuclear Waste Management  Organization (NWMO).<br /> &nbsp;<br /> The City of Elliot Lake has publicly expressed interest in possibly  becoming one of the sites for the long-term disposal of nuclear waste  for Canada&rsquo;s nuclear industry.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Elliot Lake has a long history of uranium mining that resulted in the  boom and bust of the city, as well as significant and lasting  environmental damage to the local watershed and nearby ceremonial  grounds.&nbsp;</p>
<p>In addition, there are dozens of tailings ponds surrounding Elliot Lake  currently waiting for a solution for their safe disposal.<br /> &nbsp;<br /> &ldquo;We cannot idly stand by and watch as they inject Mother Earth with  this cancer,&rdquo; says Chief Lyle Sayers [shown], chairman of the North  Shore Tribal Council. &ldquo;We must ensure that the future natural resources  of this area are there for our children, generations to come, and  businesses alike.&rdquo;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sootoday.com/content/news/details.asp?c=37141" target="_blank">Read the rest of the article.</a></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/11/26/nuclear-genocide-at-serpent-river-first-nation-elliot-lake-o.html"><rss:title>"Nuclear genocide" at Serpent River First Nation, Elliot Lake, Ontario</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/11/26/nuclear-genocide-at-serpent-river-first-nation-elliot-lake-o.html</rss:link><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-11-26T19:05:02Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.porthopehistory.com/nucleargenocide/nucleargenocide_index.htm" target="_blank"><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Elliot%20Lake.gif?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1322334551509" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 252px;">Uranium tailings wall at Elliot Lake, leaking into the Serpent River watershed. Photo by Robert Del Tredichi.</span></span>In Part 1 of his book overviewing the Canadian nuclear establishment's history, <em>Nuclear Genocide</em></a>, Pat McNamara included <a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Nuclear%20Genocide%20in%20Canada%20Part%201%20Elliot%20Lake.pdf" target="_blank">an essay on the dozen uranium mines, and associated mills and refinery, located near Elliot Lake, Ontario, Canada -- adjacent to the Serpent River First Nation</a>. Much of the essay was taken from the book <em><a href="http://www.miningwatch.ca/my-homeland-stories-effects-nuclear-industries-people-review" target="_blank">This Is My Homeland</a>,</em> edited by journalist, Serpent River First Nation Member, and Green Party of Canada indigenous peoples affairs spokesperson Lorraine Rekmans. As documented by Gordon Edwards and Robert Del Tredichi's <em><a href="http://www.ccnr.org/nuclear_map/index.html" target="_blank">Nuclear Map of Canada</a></em>, 145.3 million tonnes of radioactive tailings, out of a national Canadian total of 193.2 million tonnes -- a whopping 75% -- are located at the long-shuttered Elliot Lake uranium mines, on the Serpent River watershed which flows into Lake Huron at Georgian Bay. To this day, the Elliot Lake uranium tailings are still the largest source of radium discharges into the Great Lakes, the drinking water supply for 40 million people in the U.S., Canada, and numerous Native American First Nations.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/11/25/we-left-them-to-die-and-hoped-they-would-never-ask-any-quest.html"><rss:title>"We left them to die and hoped they would never ask any questions"</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/11/25/we-left-them-to-die-and-hoped-they-would-never-ask-any-quest.html</rss:link><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-11-25T23:17:31Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 350px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/ore_carriers.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1322263503921" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 350px;">Not having been warned about the known hazards, Dene men even slept on burlap bags containing uranium and radium</span></span>These powerful words come from Andy Orkin, an Ontario lawyer who worked on behalf of the Deline First Nations people, among the very first indigenous victims of the Atomic Age. Deline, Northwest Territories, Canada is home to a traditional Dene tribe, the only indigenous people on the mighty Great Bear Lake near the Canadian Arctic. Orkin is quoted in Part 1 of <a href="http://www.porthopehistory.com/nucleargenocide/nucleargenocide_index.htm" target="_blank">Pat McNamara's <em>Nuclear Genocide in Canada</em>.</a>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The book opens by describing Port Radium, the first uranium mine in Canada, which commenced operations in 1933. Local indigenous men were hired to haul pitchblende, uranium ore containing then-coveted radium, in burlap sacks (see photos at left). Although <a href="http://www.ccnr.org/radium_warning.html" target="_blank">the Canadian mines department had already alerted the federal government to the hazards</a>, the men of Deline were not warned. They began dying of various cancers -- diseases unknown previously to the tribe --&nbsp;at an alarming rate, in 1960.</p>
<p>Eventually, the Canadian government admitted the men's exposure to hazardous radioactive materials was to blame, but the "Village of Widows" had long since already figured&nbsp;that out themselves. As&nbsp;nuclear widow Cindy Kenny-Gilday of Deline said:</p>
<p>"This village of young men are the first generation of men in the history of Dene on this lake<br />to grow up without guidance from their grandfathers, fathers and uncles. This cultural, economic,<br />spiritual, emotional deprivation impact on the community is a threat to the survival of the one and only<br />tribe on Great Bear Lake. Itʹs the most vicious example of cultural genocide I have ever seen and it's in my own home."</p>
<p>The Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility has posted a <a href="http://www.ccnr.org/dene.html" target="_blank">1998 "Call for a Federal Response to Uranium Deaths in Deline" by the Dene First Nation People of Great Bear Lake</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/8/26/fukushima-parents-and-ngos-appeal-to-un-high-commissioner-fo.html"><rss:title>Fukushima parents and NGOs appeal to UN High Commissioner for Human Right to save children from peril of radioactive fallout</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/8/26/fukushima-parents-and-ngos-appeal-to-un-high-commissioner-fo.html</rss:link><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-08-26T19:51:18Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 250px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/fuku%20school%20children.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1314388400671" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 250px;">Fukushima children were ordered back to school last April despite severe radioactive contamination of their schoolyards by fallout from three reactor meltdowns.</span></span>On August 17th, in a statement entitled <a href="http://www.greenaction-japan.org/internal/110817_Fukushima_human_rights_UN_submission.pdf" target="_blank">"Violation of the Human Rights of the Children of Fukushima,"</a> a coalition of Japanese Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), including Fukushima Prefecture parents, appealed to the United Nations' Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to save the children of Fukushima from the perils of radioactive contamination resulting from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear catastrophe that began on March 11th. The appeal is necessary because of the inaction, and worse, of the Japanese federal government and Fukushima prefectural government. The appeal to the UN was signed by the Fukushima Network for Saving Children from Radiation; Citizens Against Fukushima Aging Nuclear Power Plants (Fukuro-no-Kai); FoE Japan (International Environmental NGO);&nbsp;Green Action; Osaka Citizens Against the Mihama, Oi and Takahama Nuclear Power Plants (Mihama-no-Kai); and Greenpeace Japan.</p>
<p>This appeal to the UN&nbsp;comes on the heels of&nbsp;<a href="http://fukushima.greenaction-japan.com/2011/05/13/petition/" target="_blank">two petitions</a>, submitted to the Japanese government on May 2nd and June 16th, which accumulated over 80,000 signatures, including 1,383 organizational signatories, from across Japan and 61 other countries worldwide. The petitions urged a speedy expanded evacuation and minimization of children's radioactive exposures by withdrawing the Japanese government's "provisional" 20 millisievert (2 Rem)&nbsp;per year radiation exposure limit for Fukushima children, and restoring the 1 millisievert (100 millirem)&nbsp;per year limit. However, the petitions have fallen on deaf ears at the Japanese federal and Fukushima prefectural governments. <a href="http://fukushima.greenaction-japan.com/2011/07/01/petition-02-protect-the-children-of-fukushima/#more-76" target="_blank">A third, related petition was launched on June 30th, and is still open to international signers.</a></p>
<p>The appeal to the UN concludes: "The children of Fukushima have the same right as all other children in Japan to live a life free from unnecessary, preventable radiation exposure. We urgently request that the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights/OHCHR come to Japan to investigate this matter."</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/7/12/defending-western-shoshone-treaty-rights-against-yucca-dump.html"><rss:title>Defending Western Shoshone treaty rights against Yucca dump</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/7/12/defending-western-shoshone-treaty-rights-against-yucca-dump.html</rss:link><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-07-12T16:15:42Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2011/07/06/news/economy/nuclear_waste/" target="_blank">CNN Money has quoted Beyond Nuclear's Kevin Kamps</a>, defending Western Shoshone Indian Nation treaty rights against the Yucca Mountain high-level radioactive waste dump proposal:</p>
<p>"...Yucca was originally Shoshone land, taken by the federal government in 1951 for weapons testing, said Kevin Kamps, a nuclear waste specialist at Beyond Nuclear.</p>
<p>And Nevada was chosen not because it was a good site, but because it had the fewest representatives in Washington of any state under consideration, critics say.</p>
<p>"The most common name for that legislation was the 'Screw Nevada Bill,' " said Kamps. "It never should have been targeted to begin with."..."</p>
<p>The U.S. government signed the "peace and friendship" Treaty of Ruby Valley with the Western Shoshone Indian Nation in 1863; it recognized Western Shoshone sovereignty at Yucca Mountain, throughout most of what is now the State of Nevada, as well as portions of California and Idaho.</p>
<p>The "Screw Nevada Bill," enacted into law in 1987, singled out Yucca Mountain as the only targeted site in the country to undergo further study as a potential high-level radioactive waste repository. The States of Washington and Texas, also on the target list, joined forces, and in coalition with eastern states also on the dumpsite target list, ganged up on Nevada. Texas and Washington had 32 and 12 Representatives in the U.S. House, respectively, whereas Nevada had but one. Texas and Washington also&nbsp;split between them&nbsp;the powerful positions of&nbsp;Speaker of the House and House Majority Leader at that time. Even Nevada's U.S. Senate delegation consisted of two low ranking&nbsp;first-term Senators. But one of those rookies was Harry Reid, who has since devoted his political career to stopping the Yucca dump, and now serves as Senate Majority Leader.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/7/3/us-japanese-and-mongolian-nuclear-establishments-conspire-to.html"><rss:title>U.S., Japanese, and Mongolian nuclear establishments conspire to dump high-level radioactive wastes in Mongolia</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/7/3/us-japanese-and-mongolian-nuclear-establishments-conspire-to.html</rss:link><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-07-03T19:33:13Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/09/us-energy-nuclear-mongolia-idUSTRE74805020110509" target="_blank"><em>Reuters</em> cites a <em>Mainichi Daily</em> report</a> that such U.S.-Japanese nuclear industry corporate players as General Electric-Hitachi and Toshiba-Westinghouse, in cahoots with Japanese federal ministries and the Mongolian government's uranium mining and nuclear development arm, were close to finalizing a deal on turning Mongolia into an international dumpsite for irradiated nuclear fuel, until the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear catastrophe derailed the schedule. Undeterred by that, the partners in crime (or, at least it should be a crime) are still pursuing the plan.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/7/1/court-ruling-an-indirect-ej-victory-for-western-shoshone-ind.html"><rss:title>Court ruling an indirect EJ victory for Western Shoshone Indian Nation!</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/human-rights-whats-new/2011/7/1/court-ruling-an-indirect-ej-victory-for-western-shoshone-ind.html</rss:link><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-07-02T01:30:23Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/yuccasweatlodgesmall.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1309570361000" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 211px;">This Jan., 2004 photo by Gabriela Bulisova shows the frame of a sacred ceremonial Western Shoshone sweat lodge, with Yucca's west face in the background.</span></span>As reported by the <em><a href="http://www.lvrj.com/news/appeals-court-dismisses-yucca-mountain-lawsuit-124862704.html" target="_blank">Las Vegas Review Journal</a></em>, U.S. Senator Harry Reid (Democrat-Nevada), Majority Leader,&nbsp;called today's decision by the Federal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia&nbsp;Circuit&nbsp;regarding the Yucca Mountain, Nevada high-level radioactive waste dump&nbsp;"an important win in the long battle to put the ill-conceived Yucca Mountain project permanently to rest." The three-judge federal appeals panel ruled against a lawsuit filed by the States of Washington and South Carolina, Aiken County (South Carolina), and three private (nuclear industry affiliated) businessmen in Washington State seeking to block the Obama administration's cancellation of the Yucca dump.</p>
<p>July seems to be the month for major Yucca decisions. On July 9, 2002, the U.S. Senate voted 60 to 39 to allow the U.S. Department of Energy to proceed with a construction and operations license application to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which George W. Bush signed into law two weeks later. Then, on July 9, 2004, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals (although comprised of a different three judge panel) ruled in favor of the State of Nevada and an environmental coalition, ordering the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency back to the drawing board on its Yucca regulations (EPA had wanted to cut off regulations at 10,000 years, long before Yucca's worst radiation releases downstream; under court order, EPA acknowledged in 2008 that high-level radioactive waste at Yucca would remain hazardous for <strong><em>a million years</em></strong>!).</p>
<p>Although a major battle victory, today's ruling does not end this 25+ year long war over the Yucca dump. Under law, the NRC has until later this year (with the possibility for a one year extension) to issue a final "yea or nay" on DOE's 2008 Yucca application. In March 2010, Obama Energy Secretary Steven Chu moved to withdraw the application, but in late June 2010 a panel of three administrative law judges at NRC (the Atomic Safety (sic) and Licensing Board, or ASLB) rejected the motion. The five NRC Commissioners have yet to sustain or overrule the ASLB ruling.</p>
<p>Reflecting the national significance of this court ruling is the widespread media coverage: <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iNHnS3gKDzQjewt9VKlUy-j-13Yw?docId=b3a94aa196a6402cbbe710d82c07f49e" target="_blank">Associated Press</a>; <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/169439-court-tosses-yucca-mountain-challenge-for-now" target="_blank">The Hill</a> (times <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/169487-reid-yucca-mountain-court-ruling-a-great-day-for-nevada" target="_blank">two</a>!); <a href="http://www.hanfordnews.com/2011/07/01/16716/appeals-court-dismisses-yucca.html" target="_blank"><em>Hanford News</em> </a>and <a href="http://www.tri-cityherald.com/2011/07/01/1551489/yucca-federal-court-rules-for.html" target="_blank"><em>Tri-City Herald</em> </a>(Washington State); <a href="http://chronicle.augusta.com/latest-news/2011-07-01/court-dismisses-suit-keep-yucca-open" target="_blank"><em>Augusta Chronicle</em> </a>(Georgia). The coverage is likely to expand as word spreads.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item></rdf:RDF>
