A deep crack just discovered this week in the concrete containment wall of the Crystal River nuclear reactor on Florida’s west coast signals a disturbing trend in on-going cracking and corrosion and other dangerous wear-and-tear symptoms among the country’s fleet of aging reactors. Beyond Nuclear argues that it is time that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission fulfill its Congressional mandate to look out for public safety instead of risking lives to save nuclear utilities money. The agency should keep the Crystal River reactor closed, Beyond Nuclear argues, while seriously evaluating the safety of continuing to relicense the country's aging reactor fleet.
As authorities effectively locked down the French city of Colmar, thousands of protesters - from France, Germany, Switzerland and elsewhere - gathered on October 3rd to demand the closure of the nearby Fessenheim reactor and an end to the nuclear age. Dressed in yellow representing solar energy and a nuclear-free future, activists entered the city through police barricades. One German representative said he had seen more police in Colmar - a city in Alsace close to the German border - than at the recent anti-nuclear protest in Berlin that drew 50,000. Beyond Nuclear's Linda Gunter was present and spoke at the rally. In the morning, before protesters arrived, she observed a silent city with stores shuttered, the streets peopled only by gendarmes, police and two trucks loaded with police horses.
During the rally, a helicopter circled overhead while activists draped an enormous banner from a nearby building which said "Nuclear kills the future" (the current nuclear slogan is "nuclear is the future,") while activists declared that "democracy is flouted." Thousands of German activists were held up at the border. Consequently, estimates on participation were made more problematic with organizers declaring 10,000 and officials 3,500.
On Sept. 22, Beyond Nuclear joined a national coalition led by Texans for a Safe Energy Policy and their attorney, Diane Curran, in submitting comments to the U.S. Department of Energy regarding a proposed weakening of its taxpayer-backed nuclear loan guarantee program rules. The coalition also includes Friends of the Earth, Nuclear Information and Resource Service, Public Citizen Texas, Physicians for Social Responsibility, and Union of Concerned Scientists. DOE’s proposal would move taxpayers further to the back of the line, allowing other investors, such as foreign export banks, to receive priority compensation when half or more of new reactor projects default on their loan repayments, at a cost of many billions per failed project. The coalition’s comments represented a prompt and strong challenge to DOE’s rushed weakening of its rules, preserving our right to pursue legal challenges to such shenanigans in the future.
This week the San Antonio Current has published the first in a three-part series of truly investigative articles on nuclear power and is being assailed by pro-nuclear forces. Endorsement for "Nuclear Power: The Truth About A Taboo Subject", a unique public health event.
New York Times columnist, Thomas Friedman, took the above semi-satirical mantra about "journalism" to heart this weekend when he penned a column that, among other falsehoods, stated that France has “managed to deal with all the radioactive waste issues without any problems or panics.” No evidence of this - quite the contrary - see our Letter to the Editor (as yet unpublished). But Friedman either didn't bother - or refused to look. (After all, it's pretty easy to miss 81 tons of plutonium sitting at La Hague with nowhere to go and 100 million gallons of liquid radioactive waste discharged annually into the English Channel. No waste problem there.)
He also described the now canceled Yucca Mountain radioactive waste repository as "totally safe." No scientific evidence of this. But then, who's looking? Not Friedman.
He mentions that French mayors "clamor to have reactors in their towns to create jobs". Utter nonsense. One French mayor of Dieppe - who was besieged by sit-in protesters - did advocate for only the second proposed new reactor in France. A couple of mayors thought having low-level waste dumps might be nice. Not much of a clamor.
Should the Times change its slogan to "all the nonense that's fit to print?"