BEYOND NUCLEAR PUBLICATIONS
Search
JOIN OUR NETWORK

     

     

DonateNow


 

Tuesday
Mar062012

Lack of permission for dry cask storage of high-level radioactive waste generated after March 21st may be Vermont Yankee's last gasp

Typical dry cask storage, with its "state of the art security system" (aka a chain link fence)Citizens Awareness Network (CAN) has posted an analysis on its website ("The Worm Turns") on how Entergy Nuclear may have planted the seed of its own destruction when it filed a lawsuit against the State of Vermont, seeking to block Vermont's efforts to shut down Vermont Yankee (VY) atomic reactor at the end of its 40 year license on March 21, 2012.

The federal district judge in Brattleboro did rule that the State of Vermont's legislature cannot intervene agaisnt VY's operations, a ruling that Vermont has appealed to the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in New York City. But the district court ruling did not bar the Vermont Public Service Board (PSB) from denying a Certificate of Public Good (CPG), which would also shut down the reactor. This has suddenly thrown Entergy Nuclear into a panic. It has "cross appealed" Vermont's filing with the 2nd Circuit, and incredibly, it has moved that the district judge "correct mistakes" in his January ruling -- namely, allowing the PSB to retain its authority to grant or deny a CPG, as it sees fit!

Specificially, the PSB must approve the dry cask storage of any irradiated nuclear fuel on the banks of the Connecticut River at VY. The PSB has asked some tough questions to Entergy about its plans -- or lack thereof -- for dry cask storage of irradiated nuclear fuel generated after March 21, 2012. Could this be the way that VY is finally forced to shut down, the desire of the vast majority of Vermont residents? Let's hope so. Ironically, the PSB will hear the parties on Friday, March 9th, in the very same building where Vermont's Act 160 was passed in the first place, the Vermont State House.

Tuesday
Mar062012

Karl Grossman calls out the "Big Lie" - the Fukushima cover-up

 Karl Grossman's article on Common Dreams reveals the cover-up at Fukushima. 

As the first anniversary of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster arrives, the cover-up involving nuclear power is more extensive than ever. The Big Lie was integral to the nuclear push from its start. Read more.

Tuesday
Mar062012

The man who stayed behind in his village near Fukushima to care for the animals

Monday
Mar052012

EDITORIAL: Nuclear-free society can be achieved much earlier

From the Asahi Shimbun: In our editorial published in July last year, we laid out a vision of a society without nuclear power generation. In that editorial, we said it would probably be possible for Japan to phase out nuclear power generation in 20 to 30 years.

However, given the fact that peak demand in August last year was fulfilled with only 12 to 16 reactors online, it now seems that vision could be realized far earlier.

Sunday
Mar042012

Kevin Kamps discusses Tokyo's close call on Thom Hartmann

And see Kevin's longer explanation of the definition of what a becquerel is, here, to provide some idea of what the "mind-boggling" figure of 40 quadrillion becquerels means (the amount of radioactive Cesium isotopes alone, currently estimated to have been released by the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Catastrophe thus far).