<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.159 (http://www.squarespace.com) on Wed, 22 May 2013 19:11:59 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Germany</title><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:39:45 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.159 (http://www.squarespace.com)</generator><item><title>Germany's energy revolution in the hands of ordinary citizens</title><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:39:22 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/2012/10/15/germanys-energy-revolution-in-the-hands-of-ordinary-citizens.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">356082:7884908:29837469</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 350px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/post-images/gchart-share-of-germany-renewable-energy-market-2011.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1350315571412" alt="" /></span></span><a href="http://www.unendlich-viel-energie.de/uploads/media/AEE_Flyer__Renewable_Energies-A_Success_Story_sep12.pdf" target="_blank">51% of the renewable energy</a><span>&nbsp;on the German grid is put there by individuals (like us) and farmers. Individuals and private investors are contributing the equivalent generation capacity in renewables of</span><a href="http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/blog/post/2012/10/germanys-unlikely-revolutionaries" target="_blank">20 nuclear power plants</a><span>. None of it is state owned. More than one million Germans are involved as energy producers or investors in renewable energy production. According to Germany's environment ministry, "New ownership models such as citizens&rsquo; wind parks and energy cooperatives show that the Energiewende cannot only bring about environmental protection and economic growth, but also decentralized production structures in the hands of local initiatives.</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/rss-comments-entry-29837469.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Angst or Arithmetic? Why Germans are so skeptical about nuclear energy</title><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:36:39 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/2012/5/23/angst-or-arithmetic-why-germans-are-so-skeptical-about-nucle.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">356082:7884908:16414528</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 200px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/post-images/German_sign.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1337801812346" alt="" /></span></span>The first in a six-part series from the Heinrich<span>B&ouml;ll</span>&nbsp;Foundation, deals with the roots of nuclear energy's unpopularity in Germany. It begins:</p>
<p><span>"The fact that Germany, in the aftermath of the 2011 Fukushima disaster, redoubled its efforts to phase out nuclear energy has nothing to do with hysteria or postwar angst. on the contrary, a majority of Germans, including much of the political class, has been unconvinced of its merits since the early 1980s; the source of this anti- atom consensus lies not in emotional populism but rather in the persuasive, fact- based arguments of a powerful, grassroots social movement that has long included nuclear physicists and other bona fide experts." By&nbsp;<span>Paul Hockenos.&nbsp;<a href="http://boell.org/downloads/Hockenos_Angst_or_Arithmetric.pdf" target="_blank">Read the full report here.</a></span></span></p>
<p><span>This paper is part one of a&nbsp;<a href="http://boell.org/web/139-Paul-Hockenos-Angst-or-Arithmetic-Why-Germans-are-so-Skeptical-about-Nuclear-Energy.html" target="_blank">six-part series on the German Energy Transition.</a>&nbsp;The authors are experts on different issues such as renewable energies, rural communities, social movements, and nuclear power. &nbsp;</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/rss-comments-entry-16414528.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Two major German firms pull out of UK nuclear programs</title><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:12:43 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/2012/4/12/two-major-german-firms-pull-out-of-uk-nuclear-programs.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">356082:7884908:15818900</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 150px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/post-images/cancel%20button.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1334261575964" alt="" /></span></span>Two giant German firms, E.On and RWE, are to pull out of building new nuclear power stations in the UK. It's the first fallout from the Japanese Fukushima disaster to hit Britain's nuclear industry,<a href="http://www.channel4.com/news/two-major-firms-pull-out-of-nuclear-new-build" target="_blank">&nbsp;reports Channel 4 news.</a>&nbsp;The joint venture run by the two firms, Horizon, was planning to build new nuclear plants at Wylfa on Anglesey, and Oldbury-on-Severn in Gloucestershire. The companies blamed the scarcity of capital in an economic crisis, the &lsquo;significant ongoing costs&rsquo;, and the fact that their home country has turned its back on nuclear power.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/rss-comments-entry-15818900.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>False claims persist (on Frontline and elsewhere) that nuclear-free Germany will emit more CO2</title><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:41:19 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/2012/1/19/false-claims-persist-on-frontline-and-elsewhere-that-nuclear.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">356082:7884908:14652026</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="ssNonEditable full-image-float-left"><span><img style="width: 180px;" src="../../storage/post-images/German_sign.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1327001990294" alt="" /></span></span>The  suggestion made during the Frontline program that Germany will emit  more Co2 as a result of its nuclear phase-out is another perfect example  of those skeptics who claim that the German nuclear phase-out was a  panicked overreaction and could even amount to environmental vandalism.&nbsp;  But science disproves these claims. Thanks to Arne Jungjohann at the  Heinrich Boell Institute for the following rebuttal:</p>
<p>Looking at the German nuclear phase-out, some have argued that  Germany will produce an extra 300m tones of carbon dioxide between now  and 2020. However<a href="http://www.wri.org/stories/2011/06/germanys-nuclear-phase-out-renewable-energy-plans-are-clear" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">, Numerous feasibility studies</span></a>, amongst others by the <a href="http://www.umweltdaten.de/publikationen/fpdf-l/4117.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">Federal Environmental Agency</span></a> or <a href="http://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/__Anlagen/2011/05/2011-05-30-abschlussbericht-ethikkommission,property=publicationFile.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">an independent Commission on Energy Choices</span></a> , have shown that the nuclear phase-out will not jeopardize Germany's  ambitious climate action efforts: reducing carbon emissions by 40  percent by 2020 and by at least 80 percent by 2050. If emissions were to  rise due to the nuclear phase-out, the government would have to come up  with compensating measures to reach these targets.</p>
<p>However, it is unlikely that emissions will rise, because according  to the rules of the EU cap-and-trade system there is a cap for emissions  from the energy sector and that of course also applies for Germany.  Even if Germany&rsquo;s nuclear capacity was to be replaced by using energy  generated in coal plants, the total energy emissions would still have to  be reduced. This could be achieved by either shifting to more natural  gas or by replacing older coal plants with new and more efficient  plants. That's <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/yglesias/2011/06/01/232818/germanys-nuclear-phase-out-and-europes-carbon-cap/" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">the genius of a cap-and-trade system</span></a>. Believe it or not, with that system in place, Germany's nuclear phase-out will even <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/jun/22/germany-nuclear-uk-emissions" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">cause emissions in other European countries to fall</span></a>.</p>
<p>The German nuclear phase-out &ndash; which is being followed by other  countries including Switzerland, Italy and Belgium &ndash; is in reality  another important element to accelerate the long-term strategy of a  transition towards a low-carbon economy.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/rss-comments-entry-14652026.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>More than half of Germany's renewable energy generations is owned by its citzens</title><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:26:53 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/2012/1/5/more-than-half-of-germanys-renewable-energy-generations-is-o.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">356082:7884908:14454168</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="ssNonEditable full-image-float-left"><span><img style="width: 300px;" src="../../storage/post-images/German%20Ownership%20of%20Renewables%202010.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1325798765850" alt="" /></span></span>In 2010, <a href="http://www.wind-works.org/coopwind/CitizenPowerConferencetobeheldinHistoricChamber.html" target="_blank">51% of the more than 50,000 MW </a>of  renewable energy capacity in  Germany was owned by farmers or  individual citizens. This represents a  staggering $100 billion in  private investment. German farmers alone have installed 1,600 MW of  biogas plants and 3,600  MW of solar photovoltaics (solar PV). For  comparison, in 2010 there was  only 60 MW of biogas plants and 2,200 MW  of solar PV in the entire USA. Thanks to passage of the feed-in tarrif  law, farmers, individuals and community groups could, for the first time  install their own wind turbines and  sell the resulting electricity for  profit.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/rss-comments-entry-14454168.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>No nukes for Siemens</title><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:25:46 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/2011/9/19/no-nukes-for-siemens.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">356082:7884908:12917906</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="ssNonEditable full-image-float-left"><span><img style="width: 150px;" src="../../storage/post-images/Peter%20Loescher.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1316467438422" alt="" /></span></span>The  German industrial and engineering conglomerate, Siemens, following on  the heels of its government's decision to abandon nuclear energy, has  withdrawn entirely from the nuclear industry. It will build no further  nuclear plants and is canceling its nuclear joint venture with Russia's  Rosatom. Siemens built all 17 of Germany's existing nuclear plants.  Siemens chief executive, Peter Loescher, (pictured) praised the Merkel  government's decision to close all its nuclear plants by 2022 and aim  for an 80% to 100% renewable energy economy by 2050, calling it "a  project of the century."</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/rss-comments-entry-12917906.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>What is the secret to success of Germany's anti-nuke movement?</title><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 02:11:55 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/2011/7/22/what-is-the-secret-to-success-of-germanys-anti-nuke-movement.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">356082:7884908:12227275</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/atomkraft%20nein%20danke2.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1311387198000" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 275px;">"Nuclear power? No thanks!" in German -- a popular anti-nuclear slogan internationally since the 1970s.</span></span>Intense grassroots organizing. Several decades worth. <a href="http://www.theworld.org/2011/07/germanys-anti-nuclear-shift/" target="_blank">In a story entitled "Germany's Anti-Nuclear Shift," Public Radio International's "The World" looks at the long history of Germany's anti-nuclear power movement</a>, especially its resistance to the national radioactive waste dumpsite at Gorleben. That long history laid the groundwork for massive street demonstrations, as well as Green Party electoral victory, in the immediate aftermath of the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe. Even pro-nuclear Conservative Party Prime Minister Angela Merkel could not withstand the popular pressure, and announced a&nbsp;dramatic reversal to her previous plans to extend the operations of Germany's 17 atomic reactors: the immediate shutdown of the 7 oldest units, followed by the gradual shutdown of the 10 remaining&nbsp;units by 2022. <a href="http://www.theworld.org/2011/07/the-touble-with-renewables-for-post-nuclear-germany/" target="_blank">A companion piece</a> shows that the replacement power will come from Germany's renewable and efficiency industries -- already world leaders -- redoubling efforts, despite challenges. Gerry Hadden, the reporter of the two stories above, added his thoughts in&nbsp;<a href="http://www.theworld.org/2011/07/nuclear-fearlessness-fatalism-germany/" target="_blank">a blog entitled "In Nukes&rsquo; Shadow, Fearlessness and Fatalism,"</a> comparing and contrasting the feelings of those living near the permanently shuttered (for safety reasons, after a fire) Brunsb&uuml;ttel nuclear power plant in Germany,&nbsp;with those living near the shattered Chernobyl Unit 4 in Ukraine.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/rss-comments-entry-12227275.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>German farmers reap $15 million from wind power</title><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:50:30 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/2011/6/28/german-farmers-reap-15-million-from-wind-power.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">356082:7884908:11945424</guid><description><![CDATA[<div class="headline-1 txc"><span class="ssNonEditable full-image-float-left"><span><img style="width: 250px;" src="../../storage/post-images/Heinrich-Boell-Stiftung_Buero_Washington_Logo.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1309263132887" alt="" /></span></span>Harvesting Clean Energy on Ontario Farms, a new report commissioned by the Heinrich Boell Foundation,</div>
<p>highlights the untapped business opportunities  for farmers that can  be found in renewable energy. The report will be  presented during a  tour through the Canadian province of Ontario in  partnership with the <a href="http://www.climateactionnetwork.ca/">Climate Action Network Canada</a>, <a href="http://www.pembina.org/">Pembina Institute</a>, and <a href="http://www.united-church.ca/">The United Church of Canada</a>.   It focuses on numerous benefits of renewable energy, such as rural   economic development and improved environmental conditions. It also   describes the government policies needed to allow farmers to embrace   these benefits.Some farmers in northern Germany make $2.5 million in a  good year  growing wheat. They make $15 million harvesting the wind, as  the <a href="http://www.ottawacitizen.com/health/German+farmer+touts+wind+rural+Ontario/5012932/story.html#ixzz1QWJzASE3" target="_blank">Ottawa Citizen</a> reports.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/rss-comments-entry-11945424.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>More ingenuity from Germany - 100% renewable electricity 24 hours a day</title><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:49:12 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/2011/6/28/more-ingenuity-from-germany-100-renewable-electricity-24-hou.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">356082:7884908:11945413</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aNZgjEDPe24" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/rss-comments-entry-11945413.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>German Greens regard 2022 phase out of 10 remaining atomic reactors as too slow</title><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:51:21 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/2011/6/15/german-greens-regard-2022-phase-out-of-10-remaining-atomic-r.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">356082:7884908:11805676</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>As <a href="http://www.huntingtonnews.net/5021" target="_blank">an op-ed by John LaForge</a> of Nukewatch in Wisconsin points out, German Greens and other anti-nuclear groups are planning Germany-wide protests this summer and fall, calling for the phaseout of the ten remaining atomic reactors immediately, not 11 years from now. In response to the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe, previously pro-nuclear conservative Chancellor Angela Merkel immediately shut down seven of the oldest reactors -- a move that will now be permanent.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/germany/rss-comments-entry-11805676.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>