<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.158 (http://www.squarespace.com) on Wed, 22 May 2013 01:23:45 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>Animals What's New</title><subtitle>Animals What's New</subtitle><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/atom.xml"/><updated>2013-05-09T04:39:35Z</updated><generator uri="http://five.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.158 (http://www.squarespace.com)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>NRC "looking at the potential implications" of radioactive goldfish found deep in the heart of FirstEnergy's Perry atomic reactor in Ohio</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/2013/5/8/nrc-looking-at-the-potential-implications-of-radioactive-gol.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/2013/5/8/nrc-looking-at-the-potential-implications-of-radioactive-gol.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-05-08T04:05:19Z</published><updated>2013-05-08T04:05:19Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/blinky.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1367985964227" alt="" /></span></span><a href="http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2013/05/03/Workers_find_goldfish_in_nuclear_plant_tunnel.html" target="_blank">As reported by the Associated Press</a>, two radioactive goldfish, swimming in radioactive reactor coolant water in a lemonade pitcher, were discovered by workers in a steam tunnel deep in the heart of FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company's (FENOC) problem-plagued Perry atomic reactor on the shore of Lake Erie northeast of Cleveland.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2013/05/firstenergy_finds_goldfish_in.html" target="_blank">As reported by the&nbsp;<em>Cleveland Plain Dealer</em>:</a></p>
<p>'...The fishy tale has prompted federal regulators to ask a lot of new questions about morale at Perry and whether plant operators can control access to radioactive areas as required by regulation...</p>
<p>Because of<a href="http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2011/07/nrc_inspectors_critical_of_per.html">&nbsp;a life-threatening incident during refueling two years ago at Perry</a>&nbsp;in which three contractors were briefly exposed to hard radiation, the NRC has put the plant under a microscope on the issue of worker safety. The agency was already preparing to send squads of inspectors to the plant in June in an effort to determine whether Perry has corrected past shortcomings. Extra inspectors were at the plant earlier during this shutdown.</p>
<p>The company and the NRC said this latest incident is no laughing matter, as in the cartoon TV series "The Simpsons" in which Blinky, an orange fish, supposedly had three eyes from radiation exposure. Whoever was involved in the Perry incident will not get off as easily as nuclear worker Homer Simpson usually does...</p>
<p>"This is not something that happens every day. We want to know why it happened and how it happened," said Viktoria Mitlyng, NRC spokeswoman for the agency's Midwest region. "We are looking at the potential implications." '</p>
<p>Add that one to the&nbsp;<a href="http://allthingsnuclear.org/fission-stories-133-mayflies-and-squirrels-and-rats/" target="_blank">"Fission Stories"!</a></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Entergy's Palisades leaks 79 gallons of radioactive water into Lake Michigan, forced to shut down</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/2013/5/7/entergys-palisades-leaks-79-gallons-of-radioactive-water-int.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/2013/5/7/entergys-palisades-leaks-79-gallons-of-radioactive-water-int.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-05-08T02:20:57Z</published><updated>2013-05-08T02:20:57Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 300px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/palisades_small.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1367980732138" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 300px;">Entergy's Palisades atomic reactor on the Lake Michigan shoreline in southwest MI</span></span><a href="http://www.hollandsentinel.com/topstories/x2062763324/NRC-Very-slightly-radioactive-water-enters-Lake-Michigan" target="_blank">As reported by the&nbsp;<em>Holland Sentinel</em>,</a>&nbsp;Entergy's Palisades atomic reactor has yet again sprung a leak, this time spilling 79 gallons of supposedly "very slightly radioactive water" into Lake Michigan, the headwaters of 20% of the world's surface fresh water, and drinking water for 40 million people downstream.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Entergy and NRC spokespersons' repeated claims of no safety significance to the public flies in the face of decades of findings, as by&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nirs.org/press/06-30-2005/1" target="_blank">the National Academy of Science (most recently in 2005</a>), that any exposure to radioactivity, no matter how small, carries a health risk of cancer, and that these health risks accumulate over a lifetime.</p>
<p>U.S. Representative Ed Markey (D-MA) made public the serious nature of this particular leaking tank in June 2012. His information came from very courageous Palisades whistleblowers, and their attorney, Billie Pirner Garde. The leak, from the 300,000 gallon Safety Injection Refueling Water (SIRW) storage tank located directly above the control, began in mid-2011, and was flowing through the ceiling, and being captured in buckets in the safety critical control room, full of electrical circuitry and equipment that cannot get wet. The leak was concealed not only from the public and media, but even from the NRC's own Chairman, Greg Jaczko, as he toured Palisades on May 25, 2012. NRC later granted Entergy an exemption in 2012 to allow continued operations despite the degraded condition of the SIRW storage tank.&nbsp;</p>
<p>In recent weeks, Beyond Nuclear learned from NRC officials that the now two-year-old leak has continued at a 0.5 to 1 gallon per day rate. But Saturday's leakage rate, which forced the reactor to shut down, was at 90 gallons per day, as documented in&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/event/en.html#en49002" target="_blank">NRC's event notification report.</a>&nbsp;Palisades' SIRW storage tank, just like the rest of the plant, is 46 years old, and obviously showing severe signs of "breakdown phase" age-degration, of increasing risk.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The&nbsp;<em><a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20130505/NEWS06/305050136/palisades-nuclear-power-plant-michigan" target="_blank">Detroit Free Press</a></em>,&nbsp;<em><a href="http://enformable.com/2013/05/37033/" target="_blank">Enformable Nuclear News</a></em>,&nbsp;<em><a href="http://www.mlive.com/news/kalamazoo/index.ssf/2013/05/water_leak_at_palisades_nuclea.html#incart_river_default" target="_blank">Kalamazoo Gazette</a></em>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.michiganradio.org/post/palisades-shutdown-comes-after-assumed-unplanned-release-radioactive-water-lake-michigan" target="_blank">Michigan Radio</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.wsjm.com/NRC-79-Gallons-Of-Mildly-Radioactive-Water-From-Pa/16279945" target="_blank">WSJM Radio</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://wkzo.com/news/articles/2013/may/06/palisades-nuclear-switched-off-over-the-weekend-to-fix-a-leak/" target="_blank">WKZO Radio</a>,<a href="http://www.wwmt.com/shared/news/features/top-stories/stories/wwmt_nrc-very-slightly-radioactive-water-enters-lake-9825.shtml" target="_blank">WWMT TV-3 Kalamazoo</a>,&nbsp;<em><a href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130505/METRO/305050333" target="_blank">Detroit News</a></em>, &nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="http://www.woodtv.com/dpp/news/local/sw_mich/nrc-radioactive-water-enters-lake" target="_blank">WOOD TV-8 Grand Rapids</a>&nbsp;have reported on this story.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/5%206%202013%20Kevin%20Kamps%20media%20statement%20on%2079%20gallons%20of%20radioactive%20water%20spilled%20into%20Lake%20Michigan.pdf" target="_blank">Beyond Nuclear issued a media statement</a>, challenging flippant Entergy and&nbsp;<a href="http://www.sfgate.com/business/energy/article/NRC-Very-slightly-radioactive-water-enters-lake-4492701.php" target="_blank">NRC claims that this leak carries "absolutely" no risk to human health and safety.</a>&nbsp;NRC's Region 3 spokeswoman has been exposed making false claims regarding radioactivity leaks more than once at Midwestern reactors in just the past year, prompting the demand for an investigation by a member of Congress.&nbsp;Last year, U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) demanded an NRC investigation into Mytling's downplaying of a reactor leak at the troubled Davis-Besse atomic reactor near Toledo. In addition, Chicago watchdog group Nuclear Energy Information Service, via a Freedom of Information Act Request to the State of Illinois Dept. of Nuclear Safety, documented that Mytling's flip assurance -- that a radioactive steam leak at the Byron atomic reactor, in Jan. 2012, must have contained exceedingly low levels of hazardous radioactive tritium, as radiation monitors had not detected any -- was baseless and misleading, as no real-time tritium monitoring capability existed at the plant. Similar questions must now be asked of Mytling's questionable assurances that radioactivity levels in the water leaked into Lake Michigan were below detectable levels. Are there radiation monitors in place to verify such flip assurances?</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Environmental coalition defends contentions against Fermi 3 proposed new reactor, challenges adequacy of NRC FEIS</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/2013/3/27/environmental-coalition-defends-contentions-against-fermi-3.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/2013/3/27/environmental-coalition-defends-contentions-against-fermi-3.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-03-27T04:06:42Z</published><updated>2013-03-27T04:06:42Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 200px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Terry%20Lodge.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1364357834910" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 200px;">Environmental coalition attorney Terry Lodge</span></span>Terry Lodge (photo, left), Toledo-based attorney representing an environmental coalition opposing the proposed new Fermi 3 atomic reactor targeted at the Lake Erie shore in Monroe County, MI, has filed&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Fermi%20Intervenors%20Reply%20March%2025%202013%20Contentions%203%2013%2023%2026%2027%20downloadAttachment.pdf" target="_blank">a reply to challenges</a>&nbsp;from Detroit Edison (DTE) and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff.</p>
<p>The coalition's reply re-asserted "no confidence" in DTE's ability to safely stored Class B and C "low-level" radioactive wastes on-site at Fermi 3 into the indefinite future, due to the lack of sure access to a disposal facility. it also again emphasized the lack of documented need for the 1,550 Megawatts of electricity Fermi 3 would generate. <strong>And the coalition alleged that NRC has failed to fulfill its federal responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as by the illegal "segmentation" of the needed transmission line corridor from the rest of the Fermi 3 reactor construction and operation proposal.</strong></p>
<p>This legal filing follows by a week upon the submission of public comments about NRC's Fermi 3 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS).&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Fermi%203%20FEIS%20Comments%20Jessie%20Pauline%20Collins%20Don%27t%20Waste%20Michigan.pdf" target="_blank">The comments, commissioned by Don't Waste Michigan and prepared by Jessie Pauline Collins</a>, were endorsed by a broad coalition of individuals and environmental groups, including Beyond Nuclear. The FEIS comments included satellite images of harmful&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Lake%20Erie%20algae%202012.pdf" target="_blank">algal blooms in Lake Erie in 2012</a>, and in&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Lake%20Erie%20Satellite%20Images%20algae%20monroe%202011%202012.pdf" target="_blank">2011 to 2012</a>, attributable in significant part to thermal electric power plants such as Detroit Edison's Monroe (coal burning) Power Plant, at 3,300 Megawatts-electric the second largest coal burner in the U.S. Fermi 3's thermal discharge into Lake Erie will worsen this already very serious ecological problem.</p>
<p>In the very near future, the environmental coalition intervening against the Fermi 3 combined Construction and Operating License Application (COLA) will submit additional filings on its contentions challenging the lack of adequate quality assurance (QA) on the project, as well as <strong>its defense of the threatened Eastern Fox Snake and its critical wetlands habitat. The State of Michigan has stated that Fermi 3's construction would represent the largest impact on Great Lakes coastal wetlands in the history of state wetlands preservation law.&nbsp;</strong></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Fermi 3 Final Environmental Impact Statement incomplete: intervenors reveal major inadequacies; NRC announces major delays in Safety Evaluation Report; major setbacks projected</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/2013/2/21/fermi-3-final-environmental-impact-statement-incomplete-inte.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/2013/2/21/fermi-3-final-environmental-impact-statement-incomplete-inte.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-02-21T23:58:38Z</published><updated>2013-02-21T23:58:38Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/esbwr.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1361491332710" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 250px;">An artist's rendition of the ESBWR targeted to be built at Fermi 3</span></span>On Feb. 19, 2013, the environmental coalition intervening in opposition to the construction and operation of Detroit Edison's proposed new Fermi 3 atomic reactor filed new and amended contentions in response to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Final Environmental Impact Statement about the proposal.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/FINAL%20DRAFT%20FEIS%20Press%20Release%202%2021%2013.pdf" target="_blank">The coalition issued a news release.</a>&nbsp;As environmental coalition attorney Terry Lodge says in the press release, Fermi 3's price tag has skyrocketed to $20 billion.</p>
<p>An important aspect of the environmental intervention is defense of endangered species. An Eastern Fox Snake threatened species contention is set for hearing on the merits before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board this autumn. The construction of Fermi 3, and its new transmission line corridor, could extirpate the species due to stressing or even killing Eastern Fox Snakes, as well as destroying their habitat. Additional endangered species are present at both the reactor construction site, and along the undeveloped land in the proposed transmission line corridor.</p>
<p>Documents related to environmental intervenors' filing of Feb. 19, 2013 in opposition to the General Electric-Hitachi so-called "Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor" (or ESBWR, see image, left) proposed to be constructed and operated at the Fermi nuclear power plant in Monroe County, Michigan, on the Lake Erie shoreline, as well as documents reveal the major schedule delays afflicting the project:</p>
<p>Intervenors' Feb. 19, 2013&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/ASLB%20Fermi%203%20Motion%20for%20Admission%20313232627%20downloadAttachment.pdf" target="_blank">"MOTION FOR RESUBMISSION OF CONTENTIONS 3 AND 13,&nbsp;FOR RESUBMISSION OF CONTENTION 23 OR ITS ADMISSION&nbsp;AS A NEW CONTENTION, AND FOR ADMISSION OF NEW&nbsp;CONTENTIONS 26 AND 27"</a>;</p>
<p>Current&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Fermi%203%20COLA%20Review%20Schedule%20-%202-15-13.pdf" target="_blank">Fermi 3 COLA Review Schedule</a>&nbsp;(Feb. 15, 2013), showing 2 years and 10 month of delay;</p>
<p>Original&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Fermi%203%20Schedule%206-30-09.pdf" target="_blank">Fermi 3 Schedule&nbsp;</a>(June 30, 2009).</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Entergy Watch: Bill in Vermont State House seeks more stringent decommissioning at Vermont Yankee</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/2013/2/8/entergy-watch-bill-in-vermont-state-house-seeks-more-stringe.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/2013/2/8/entergy-watch-bill-in-vermont-state-house-seeks-more-stringe.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-02-09T01:03:49Z</published><updated>2013-02-09T01:03:49Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 300px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/VT%20State%20House.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1360371870758" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 300px;">The Vermont State House</span></span><a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/vermont/2013/02/07/vermont-bill-would-hold-nuke-shutdown-promise/nXXZotRWhtF3NmVQiIF6IL/story.html" target="_blank">As reported by AP,</a>&nbsp;a bill has been introduced in the State of Vermont legislature, opening yet another battlefront against Entergy's Vermont Yankee atomic reactor. The legislation seeks to establish more exacting decommissioning clean-up standards than are required by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), with an added price tag of $40 million.</p>
<p>&lsquo;&lsquo;They've had a history of backing away from agreements and promises, and we want to make sure we protect the residents of Vernon and, by extension, Vermont taxpayers from liability related to decommissioning the plant,&rsquo;&rsquo; said Rep. Margaret Cheney, vice chair of the House committee and a lead sponsor of the bill.</p>
<p>Chief among the "rogue corporation" Entergy's "broken promises" to the Green Mountain State was a signed agreement to shutdown Vermont Yankee by March 22, 2012 if it failed to obtain a renewed Certificate of Public Good (CPG) from the Vermont Public Service Board. The Vermont State Senate voted 26 to 4 in Feb. 2010 to block the issuance of the CPG, due to reasons other than radiological safety (NRC's jurisdiction) recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court as falling under state authority. Nearly a year later, Entergy still operates VY without the required CPG.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>"Endangered Snakes Prompt Hearing Over Fermi 3 Nuclear Plant"</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/2013/2/5/endangered-snakes-prompt-hearing-over-fermi-3-nuclear-plant.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/2013/2/5/endangered-snakes-prompt-hearing-over-fermi-3-nuclear-plant.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-02-05T18:06:46Z</published><updated>2013-02-05T18:06:46Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 300px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/fox_snake1_t670.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1360087674838" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 300px;">An Eastern Fox Snake, an endangered constrictor species indigenous to southeast Michigan</span></span><a href="http://www.monroenews.com/news/2013/feb/05/endangered-snakes-prompt-hearing-over-fermi-3-nucl/" target="_blank">The&nbsp;<em>Monroe Evening News</em>&nbsp;has reported</a>&nbsp;on an environmental coalition's successful bid for hearing before the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) in opposition to Detroit Edison's proposed new Fermi 3 atomic reactor on the Lake Erie shore of southeast Michigan.</p>
<p>The coalition is comprised of Beyond Nuclear, Citizens for Alternatives to Chemical Contamination, Citizens Environment Alliance of Southwestern Ontario, Don't Waste Michigan, and Sierra Club Michigan Chapter.</p>
<p>It contends that the nuclear utility, federal government, and State of Michigan are failing to protect the endangered Eastern Fox Snake species (see photo, left) from extinction due to habitat destruction caused by the construction and operation of a 1,550 Megawatt-electric General Electric Hiticahi so-called "Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor" (ESBWR), as well as an associated 11-mile long, 300-foot wide transmission line corridor.</p>
<p>The State of Michigan has admitted the reactor construction will involve the largest impact on Great Lakes coastal wetlands in the history of state environmental protection law. Combined with the transmission line's destruction of more than 1,000 acres of undeveloped land, including forests and wetlands, the coalition contends the habitat loss could extirpate the endangered Eastern Fox Snake species in the region.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/new-reactors/2013/1/30/eastern-fox-snake-contention-against-fermi-3-moves-to-eviden.html" target="_blank">More.</a></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Watchdogs continue to hound Entergy Pilgrim</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/2013/1/16/watchdogs-continue-to-hound-entergy-pilgrim.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/2013/1/16/watchdogs-continue-to-hound-entergy-pilgrim.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-01-17T04:19:55Z</published><updated>2013-01-17T04:19:55Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 300px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/whale%20at%20pilgrim.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1358396741608" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 300px;">Mother endangered Right Whale near PNPS on 1/15/13, calf is out-of-view. Images acquired under authorization of NOAA/NMFS. Credit: Rachel Karasik.</span></span>Watchdog groups such as&nbsp;<a href="http://www.pilgrimwatch.org/" target="_blank">Pilgrim Watch</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.capedownwinders.org/" target="_blank">Cape Downwinders</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.pilgrimcoalition.org/" target="_blank">Pilgrim Coalition</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="http://www.capecodbaywatch.org/" target="_blank">Cape Cod Bay Watch</a>&nbsp;keep up the good fight against Entergy's Pilgrim atomic reactor in Plymouth, MA. Pilgrim is a four decade old General Electric Mark I Boiling Water Reactor, the same age, or older, and design as the Fukushima Daiichi Units 1 to 4 reactors.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Pilgrim Watch spearheaded a six year long intervention against the reactor's 20-year license extension, a record of resistance. But, just as it has done 72 other times across the U.S. since 2000, NRC rubberstamped the license extension in the end.</p>
<p>Member of Cape Downwinders, who have carried out non-violent civil disobedience actions in opposition to Pilgrim's ongoing risks, networked with Beyond Nuclear staff at a Clamshell Alliance reunion in New Hampshire last July. A key risk is that there is "No Escape from the Cap" should the worst happen at Pilgrim,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.capedownwinders.org/pdf/MEMA_Dir_Schwartz_BCREPC_121003.pdf" target="_blank">as recently affirmed by the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency itself.</a>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wickedlocal.com/plymouth/news/x1146192513/NUCLEAR-MATTERS-A-bridge-too-far#axzz2IFVwVRC3" target="_blank"><em>Wicked Local Plymouth</em>&nbsp;</a>reported: &ldquo;There are no plans to evacuate us from danger,&rdquo; Pilgrim Coalition wrote in a release quoting Falmouth resident and Cape Downwinders member Bill Maurer, &ldquo;but there are plans to control us during that danger, which essentially insures that we will be exposed to that danger.&rdquo;<span><br /></span></p>
<p>Pilgrim Coalition is plugging Pilgrim's shutdown:</p>
<p>"Plug-In to Unplug Pilgrim: this is an opportunity to find your place in a growing movement to remove the risk from Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station in your community.</p>
<p>Join us on&nbsp;<strong>February 6, 2013 in the Otto Fehlow Room</strong>&nbsp;of the Plymouth Public Library and kick off the new year by learning about the issue and ways you can help. Snacks and refreshments will be served.</p>
<p>For more information, contact Karen Vale at info@capecodbaywatch.org or (508) 951-4723."</p>
<p>And Cape Cod Bay Watch points out that&nbsp;<a href="http://www.capecodbaywatch.org/2012/05/blog-post-plymouth-is-where-no-nukes-meets-save-the-whales/" target="_blank">"Plymouth Is Where NO NUKES Meets SAVE THE WHALES"</a>&nbsp;(see photo, above left).&nbsp;<a href="http://www.wickedlocal.com/plymouth/topstories/x1146192563/NUKE-MATTERS-Groundwater-pollution-at-Pilgrim-Nuclear-Station#axzz2IFVwVRC3" target="_blank">It has just today published a piece in the&nbsp;<em>Wicked Local Plymouth</em>&nbsp;about Pilgrim's harmful tritium and nitrogen pollution into the underlying Plymouth-Carver Sole Source Aquifer</a>, recognized by the U.S. Environmental Protetion Agency as &ldquo;the principal source of drinking water for the residents of the area."</p>
<p><a href="http://www.patriotledger.com/business/x1665863424/Power-plant-in-Plymouth-back-online" target="_blank">As reported by the&nbsp;<em>Patriot Ledger</em></a>, Pilgrim just resumed operations after a one week shutdown, caused by an electrical relay failure at the 41 year old reactor which blocked the operation of two water recirculation pumps.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Cattle in South Africa contaminated with uranium</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/2013/1/8/cattle-in-south-africa-contaminated-with-uranium.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/2013/1/8/cattle-in-south-africa-contaminated-with-uranium.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2013-01-08T23:40:15Z</published><updated>2013-01-08T23:40:15Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 200px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/post-images/Milkfarmcows.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1357688631073" alt="" /></span></span>A researcher from North West University has found that the internal  organs of cattle kept in the Wonderfontein Spruit area have been  contaminated with uranium and cobalt. Uranium levels in the animals' kidneys were 4,350 times higher than those in a control group. The cattle were eating grass that grew next to the river. This indicated that the heavy metals bio-accumulated in the grass, said the researcher, David Hamman. <a href="http://www.bizcommunity.com/Article/196/475/87268.html" target="_blank">More.</a></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Environmental coalition defends Davis-Besse intervention at ASLB oral argument pre-hearings in Toledo</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/2012/11/6/environmental-coalition-defends-davis-besse-intervention-at.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/2012/11/6/environmental-coalition-defends-davis-besse-intervention-at.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2012-11-07T02:03:24Z</published><updated>2012-11-07T02:03:24Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 250px;" src="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/Terry%20Lodge.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1352253926884" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 250px;">Environmental coalition attorney Terry Lodge of Toledo speaks out against Davis-Besse's 20 year license extension at a press conference at an NRC meeting at Oak Harbor High School, Oak Harbor, OH on August 9, 2012</span></span>The environmental coalition comprised of Beyond Nuclear, Citizens Environment Alliance of Southwestern Ontario, Don't Waste Michigan, and the Green Party of Ohio has defended its safety and environmental intervention contentions against the proposed 20 year license extension at FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company's (FENOC) Davis-Besse atomic reactor. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Atomic Safety (sic) and Licensing Board (ASLB) oral argument pre-hearings took place on Nov. 5th and 6th (yes, Election Day) in Toledo, Ohio at the Lucas County Courthouse. The coalition's representatives, including attorney Terry Lodge of Toledo (photo, left), Kevin Kamps of Beyond Nuclear, and Michael Keegan of Don't Waste Michigan, squared off against opposition to the contentions mounted by FENOC's and NRC's legal teams and experts.</p>
<p>The environmental coalition defended its Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives (SAMA) analyses contentions -- environmental contentions already admitted for a full hearing on the merits by ASLB -- against a motion for summary disposition mounted by FENOC. The coalition also advocated for admission of its cracked concrete containment contention -- a safety and environmental contention -- for a full hearing on the merits, while FENOC and NRC staff opposed it.</p>
<p>On Monday, the&nbsp;<em>Toledo Blade</em>&nbsp;published an editorial,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.toledoblade.com/Editorials/2012/11/05/Tough-enough-to-last.html" target="_blank">"Tough enough to last?"</a>, questioning the structural integrity of the shield building for 25 more years (2012 to 2037). Today, it ran an article,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.toledoblade.com/Energy/2012/11/06/Davis-Besse-hearings-open.html" target="_blank">"Davis-Besse hearings open."</a>&nbsp;U.S. Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), a long-time watchdog on Davis-Besse and other FENOC atomic reactors,<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/11%206%2012%20Kucinich%20statement%20on%20Davis%20Besse%20cracking%20appeal.pdf" target="_blank">submitted a statement</a>&nbsp;for the hearing record.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Indian Point needlessly kills over a billion fish, eggs and fish larvae annually</title><id>http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/2012/10/19/indian-point-needlessly-kills-over-a-billion-fish-eggs-and-f.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/animals-whats-new/2012/10/19/indian-point-needlessly-kills-over-a-billion-fish-eggs-and-f.html"/><author><name>admin</name></author><published>2012-10-20T02:53:35Z</published><updated>2012-10-20T02:53:35Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<div>
<p><a href="http://www.riverkeeper.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Indian-Point-2012.pdf" target="_blank">Riverkeeper reports in a fact sheet</a>&nbsp;on the Entergy Nuclear Indian Point Units 2 &amp; 3 atomic reactors:</p>
<p>"...in 2010 the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) denied a critical water quality certification required for the relicensing of Indian Point. Because Indian Point needlessly kills over a billion fish, eggs and fish larvae annually, and has been leaking radioactive waste into the groundwater and the Hudson River, the State determined that Indian Point's continued operation would violate state water quality standards.</p>
<p>A full hearing on the State's 2010 water quality determination began on October 17, 2011. Riverkeeper is mounting a comprehensive legal effort to support the State and deny the water quality certification Indian Point needs to operate. A victory would mark a turning point in Riverkeeper's decades long campaign to halt Indian Point's environmental assault on the Hudson River and force the plant's retirement."</p>
</div>]]></content></entry></feed>